Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to chi-qhsun/Codex-Semantic-Review. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/chi-qhsun/Codex-Semantic-Review/master/.agents/skills/commit-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chi-qhsun/Codex-Semantic-ReviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chi-qhsun/codex-semantic-review/commit-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chi-qhsun/codex-semantic-review/commit-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chi-qhsun/codex-semantic-review/commit-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chi-qhsun/codex-semantic-review/commit-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chi-qhsun/codex-semantic-review/commit-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00288 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00115 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
commit-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Commit Review
After the mandatory post-commit reminder, explicitly invoke the local
codex-commit-review MCP. Use prepare_commit_history_review and
create_commit_history_review for multiple pending SHAs; use the compatible
single-commit tools for one SHA. Keep committed parent-to-SHA diffs separate
from any dirty working tree.
Use stable plan item IDs when a build plan exists. When it does not, retain the
MCP's explicitly marked auto-generated / unplanned plan. Author substantive
before/after, contract, risk, and verification explanations for every required
file/function/block/line target and link them with plan_item_ids.
Require the localhost URL, root digest, per-commit receipts, important files,
plan coverage, four comment counters, and semantic_review.passed for every
requested SHA. Heuristic notes never satisfy the semantic gate. Amend/rebase
replacements use their new SHA; unreachable superseded commits are inactive.
This local workflow never authorizes push, merge, upload, or unrelated process
changes.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A de19fbdc9745
commit-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository chi-qhsun/Codex-Semantic-Review (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 288 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
hero-diff-highlight
A dark code editor reveals a red deletion then a green addition with a soft pulse. Function: PR / code-change explainer.
git-pr-workflows-git-workflow
Guide changes through code checks, testing, commits, and pull request preparation. Use when coordinating a complete Git workflow and verifying readiness for collaboration.