Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add chiruu12/OSS-Skills --skill oss-write-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chiruu12/OSS-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-write-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-write-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-write-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-write-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chiruu12/oss-skills/oss-write-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to low
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- low Excessive Agency · line 150 Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.02487 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00995 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00497 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00249 |
Grade A, and why
oss-write-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 228 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write Docs
Contribute documentation that a maintainer would write — accurate, audience-aware, and verified against the actual code. Docs contributions have different mechanics than code PRs: you need to understand who reads the docs, verify every claim against source code, and test every example.
Purpose
Documentation contributions are undervalued by contributors and overvalued by maintainers. Most contributors skip docs because they don't feel like "real" contributions. But outdated docs cause more user frustration than most bugs, and maintainers rarely have time to keep docs current. This skill guides you through finding real documentation gaps, verifying accuracy against the code, and writing docs that match the repo's voice and style.
When to Use
- You've found outdated setup instructions (you followed them and they didn't work)
- Public API methods or functions lack documentation
- README assumes knowledge that new users don't have
- Code examples in docs don't run or produce wrong output
- Error messages reference docs that don't exist
- NOT for writing docs for your own project
- NOT for adding inline code comments — that's part of code contributions
- NOT when the repo has no docs infrastructure at all — discuss with maintainers first
Prerequisites
- Repo forked, cloned, and set up (from
oss-prep-to-contribute) - You've actually tried to USE the docs and found problems (not just skimming)
- Understanding of the area you're documenting (or willingness to build it)
Process
1. Identify documentation gaps
The best doc contributions come from actually using the docs and finding where they fail.
# Find docs files
find . -name "*.md" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*" | head -30
ls docs/ doc/ documentation/ wiki/ 2>/dev/null
# Check for docs framework
ls docusaurus.config.* mkdocs.yml conf.py book.toml .readthedocs.yml 2>/dev/null
# Find broken links in docs
grep -rn '\[.*\](.*\.md)' docs/ README.md | while read line; do
file=$(echo "$line" | sed -n 's/.*(\([^)]*\.md\)).*/\1/p')
[ -n "$file" ] && [ ! -f "$file" ] && echo "Broken link: $line"
done
# Find code examples and check if they reference current APIs
grep -rn '```' docs/ README.md --include="*.md" | head -20
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 228 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 6357fe560f0d
oss-write-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository chiruu12/OSS-Skills (61 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 2,487 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
conventional-commit
Rules for writing Conventional Commits messages in this project. MUST be invoked every time a commit is created.
make-pr-easy-to-review
Prepare PRs for review by cleaning noisy history, improving PR descriptions, and adding reviewer guidance without changing code behavior. Use for "make this easy to review", "tidy this PR", "clean up commits", or "annotate the diff".
fix-merge-conflicts
Resolve merge conflicts non-interactively, validate build and tests, and finalize conflict resolution.
commit
Commit the current work — runs the quality, consistency and passport gates, branches off main if needed, stages specific files, and writes a commit whose subject states what is now true. Pushes and opens a pull request only with --pr or when the user asks; never merges — a merge happens only when the user explicitly…
watch-pr
Watch an Elixir/Phoenix PR for new review comments (bot + human) and CI results via a background watcher that wakes Claude only on real events. Use after opening a PR or pushing, while waiting on CI or reviewers.
release
CONTRIBUTOR TOOL - Cut a plugin release: bump plugin.json version, finalize CHANGELOG, update README if needed, gate on make ci, commit, tag vX.Y.Z, and create the GitHub release. Use when shipping a new plugin version. NOT distributed.