Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ChloeVPin/open-agent-skills --skill performance-regression-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChloeVPin/open-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chloevpin/open-agent-skills/performance-regression-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chloevpin/open-agent-skills/performance-regression-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chloevpin/open-agent-skills/performance-regression-analysis.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01070 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00535 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00214 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
performance-regression-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 65 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A f7e5abc6bfef
performance-regression-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository ChloeVPin/open-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,070 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ase-code-lint
Lint source code for potential code quality problems. Use when the user wants to "lint" or "check" source code.
ase-code-edit
Edit Source Code: Use when the user wants to "edit" the code base in one shot from a query or a bare analyzer issue id like "P1", fusing crafting, refactoring, and resolving with optional grilling, verification, looping, and Git worktree isolation.
ase-code-resolve
Resolve Problem: Use when user wants to "bugfix" or "fix" code or "resolve" a problem.
debugging
Investigate failures whose root cause is still unknown — narrow the search space, instrument, and test falsifiable hypotheses. Use for intermittent or environment-dependent behavior, unexplained stack traces, regressions with no known trigger, or any symptom without a confirmed cause. Ends once the root cause is…
ase-meta-why
Five-Whys Root-Cause Analysis.
testing
Strategy and rules for writing or improving automated tests. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, fixing flaky tests, setting up a test suite, or deciding what and how to test. Emphasizes deterministic tests, testing behavior over implementation, and a tight validation loop. For diagnosing production failures…