Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add christian289/dotnet-with-claudecode --skill wpf-rule-mvvm-constraintsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christian289/dotnet-with-claudecodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/christian289/dotnet-with-claudecode/wpf-rule-mvvm-constraints)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christian289/dotnet-with-claudecode/wpf-rule-mvvm-constraints"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christian289/dotnet-with-claudecode/wpf-rule-mvvm-constraints/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christian289/dotnet-with-claudecode/wpf-rule-mvvm-constraints"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christian289/dotnet-with-claudecode/wpf-rule-mvvm-constraints.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00456 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
wpf-rule-mvvm-constraints scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
MVVM Constraints
Rules for enforcing strict MVVM layer separation in wpf-dev-pack projects.
Prohibited DLL References in ViewModel Projects
ViewModel projects must NOT reference these assemblies:
WindowsBase.dllPresentationFramework.dllPresentationCore.dll
If any of these appear in a .csproj targeting the ViewModel layer, remove them immediately.
Prohibited Using Statements
The following namespaces must never appear in ViewModel code:
// Prohibited in ViewModel projects
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Data;
using System.Windows.Media;
using System.Windows.Input; // except ICommand — use CommunityToolkit.Mvvm instead
Allowed Using Statements
These namespaces are safe for ViewModels:
// Allowed
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.ComponentModel;
using CommunityToolkit.Mvvm.ComponentModel;
using CommunityToolkit.Mvvm.Input;
ViewModel Type Restrictions
ViewModel properties and constructor parameters must use BCL types only:
string,int,double,bool,decimal,DateTime,GuidObservableCollection<T>,List<T>,IEnumerable<T>- Other ViewModels or domain model types
Do NOT expose WPF types (Brush, Visibility, ImageSource, Thickness, etc.) as ViewModel properties. Convert in the View layer using converters or triggers.
CommunityToolkit.Mvvm
Prefer CommunityToolkit.Mvvm for all ViewModel base classes and commands:
- Inherit from
ObservableObjectorObservableRecipient - Use
[ObservableProperty]for bindable properties (source-generated) - Use
[RelayCommand]for commands (source-generated) - Never hand-roll
INotifyPropertyChangedorICommandimplementations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 2e280af409df
wpf-rule-mvvm-constraints is a skill published in the GitHub repository christian289/dotnet-with-claudecode (41 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 456 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-analysis
Use the free built-in .NET SDK analyzers and analysis levels with gradual Roslyn warning promotion. USE FOR: the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers; CI should fail on analyzer warnings; the team needs AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode guidance. DO NOT USE FOR: third-party analyzer selection by itself; formatting-only…
graphify-dotnet
Use graphify-dotnet to generate codebase knowledge graphs, architecture snapshots, and exportable repository maps from .NET or polyglot source trees, with optional AI-enriched semantic relationships. USE FOR: graphify commands; graph JSON, HTML, SVG, Cypher, Markdown, and Obsidian exports; repository map and…
sonarjs
Use SonarJS-derived rules in .NET repositories that ship JavaScript or TypeScript frontends and need deeper bug-risk, code-smell, or cognitive-complexity checks than a minimal ESLint baseline. USE FOR: SonarQube, SonarCloud, or eslint-plugin-sonarjs setups; frontend code smells; cognitive complexity and deeper…
address-review
Read PR review comments from GitHub, evaluate, address, and reply.
resharper-clt
Use the free official JetBrains ReSharper Command Line Tools for .NET repositories. USE FOR: jb inspectcode; jb cleanupcode; stronger C# inspections, cleanup profiles, and CI-friendly JetBrains analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing tests with inspection output; ad-hoc formatting-only work when the repo intentionally…
meziantou-analyzer
Use the open-source free Meziantou.Analyzer package for design, usage, security, performance, and style rules in .NET. Use when a repo wants broader analyzer coverage with a single NuGet package. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants Meziantou.Analyzer; the team wants one analyzer pack that covers design, usage, security…