code-analysis

code-analysis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from managedcode/dotnet-skills. It costs 99 tokens per session (1,943 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to the built-in .NET code analyzers that report maintainability and coding issues. It covers analysis levels, warning severity, and gradually treating analyzer warnings as build failures.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to configure AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode, promote warnings in stages, and enforce analyzer results in CI.
Why use it?
It helps teams introduce static checks using tools already included with the .NET SDK. This makes code-quality rules visible during builds without choosing third-party analyzers.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it to configure AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode, promote warnings in stages, and enforce analyzer results in CI.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-analysis
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add managedcode/dotnet-skills --skill code-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/dotnet-skills/code-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 99 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,943 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00099 $0.01943
Opus 5 $0.00049 $0.00971
Sonnet 5 $0.00020 $0.00389
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00194

Measured 6d ago against content hash e3109d36fdd2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

catalog/Tools/Code-Analysis/skills/code-analysis/SKILL.md · 192 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

.NET Code Analysis

Trigger On

  • the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers
  • CI should fail on analyzer warnings
  • the team needs AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode guidance
  • the repo needs a gradual Roslyn warning promotion strategy

Do Not Use For

  • third-party analyzer selection by itself
  • formatting-only work

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • project files or Directory.Build.props
  • current analyzer severity policy

Hard Rules for AI Agents

Non-negotiable. Violating these undermines the user's explicit intent.

  1. Never disable or remove TreatWarningsAsErrors or WarningsAsErrors if the project has set them. Do not comment them out, set to false, wrap in a condition, or add <TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors> to make the build pass.
  2. Never add <NoWarn> or #pragma warning disable for warnings the user chose to treat as errors, unless the user explicitly approves the suppression.
  3. Never silently downgrade severity in .editorconfig (e.g. error to warning or none) to make a build succeed.
  4. If warnings-as-errors breaks the build — fix the code. If the fix is too large, ask the user whether to defer that warning ID.
  5. If warning volume is too large to fix in one pass — report count and categories to the user and ask which to tackle first. Do not unilaterally disable the policy.

Workflow

flowchart TD
    A[Start] --> B{New or legacy project?}
    B -->|New| C[TreatWarningsAsErrors=true immediately]
    B -->|Legacy| D[dotnet build, count warnings by ID]
    D --> E{"< 30 warnings?"}
    E -->|Yes| F[Fix all, then enable TreatWarningsAsErrors]
    E -->|No| G[Report counts to user, ask which batch first]
    G --> H[Add selected IDs to WarningsAsErrors]
    H --> I[Fix that batch, verify build]
    I --> J{More batches?}
    J -->|Yes| G
    J -->|No| F
    C --> K[Set AnalysisLevel latest-recommended]
    F --> K
    K --> L[Promote security CA3xxx/CA5xxx to error in .editorconfig]
    L --> M[Validate: build + CI green]

Read the full file on GitHub · 192 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 192 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A e3109d36fdd2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/dotnet-skills (477 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 1,943 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

pr-review

Multi-dimensional review of a PR or feature branch in microsoft/win-dev-skills. Activate on "review my PR / changes / branch", "vet before pushing", "PR review", "is this ready to merge". Fans out parallel sub-agents over skill content, the skill-vs-tool boundary (solution hierarchy), tool correctness…

microsoft/win-dev-skills · 98 tokens

winui-code-review

Code quality review for WinUI 3 apps — MVVM compliance, x:Bind correctness, accessibility, theming, security, and performance. Use before committing to catch issues that the compiler and UI tests won't find.

microsoft/win-dev-skills · 49 tokens

best-practices

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities". Do NOT use for accessibility (use web-accessibility), SEO (use seo), performance (use…

tech-leads-club/agent-skills · 85 tokens

gh-address-comments

Address review and issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI. Use when user says "address PR comments", "fix review feedback", "respond to PR review", or "handle PR comments". Verifies gh auth first and prompts to authenticate if not logged in. Do NOT use for creating PRs, CI debugging…

tech-leads-club/agent-skills · 85 tokens

clean-code-review

Run a comprehensive Clean Code audit against the codebase — module size, function complexity, long parameter lists, TODO/FIXME markers, commented-out code, duplication (DRY), Boy Scout delta, dead exports, test smells, shell-parity (PS/Bash twins), dep boundaries (cross-package imports), frozen-arrays drift…

srnichols/plan-forge · 92 tokens

code-review

Plan-Forge-tuned comprehensive code review — runs public-surface diff, forge analysis, architecture / security / testing / patterns checks, plus Plan-Forge-specific gates (ACI compliance, dual-shell parity, branch model). Use before merging features or at the end of a phase. With --quorum, dispatches multi-model…

srnichols/plan-forge · 70 tokens