Orleans.RateLimiting: Skill for Codex

.codex/skills/code-analysis/SKILL.md

code-analysis is a skill for Codex from managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting. It costs 56 tokens per session (1,886 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of code-analysis, MIT.

A setup for the built-in .NET code analyzers, which inspect source code for likely problems and style or quality issues. It also defines how strongly analyzer warnings should be enforced during builds and continuous integration.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to enable .NET analyzers, configure analysis levels, and promote warnings to errors in builds or CI without hiding existing warnings.
Why use it?
It makes code-quality checks consistent and can stop builds when selected warnings are present. A gradual policy helps a project improve without changing every warning at once.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: installed under .codex/. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md.

This is managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting's own configuration. It tells Codex how to work on Orleans.RateLimiting itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything Orleans.RateLimiting configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting/main/.codex/skills/code-analysis/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/orleans.ratelimiting/code-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/orleans.ratelimiting/code-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/orleans.ratelimiting/code-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/orleans.ratelimiting/code-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/managedcode/orleans.ratelimiting/code-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/managedcode/orleans.ratelimiting/code-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 56 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,886 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00056 $0.01886
Opus 5.5 $0.00022 $0.00754
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00377
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00189

Measured 19d ago against content hash 36df9b70ee5a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to code-analysis — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.codex/skills/code-analysis/SKILL.md · 192 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

.NET Code Analysis

Trigger On

  • the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers
  • CI should fail on analyzer warnings
  • the team needs AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode guidance
  • the repo needs a gradual Roslyn warning promotion strategy

Do Not Use For

  • third-party analyzer selection by itself
  • formatting-only work

Inputs

  • the nearest AGENTS.md
  • project files or Directory.Build.props
  • current analyzer severity policy

Hard Rules for AI Agents

Non-negotiable. Violating these undermines the user's explicit intent.

  1. Never disable or remove TreatWarningsAsErrors or WarningsAsErrors if the project has set them. Do not comment them out, set to false, wrap in a condition, or add <TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors> to make the build pass.
  2. Never add <NoWarn> or #pragma warning disable for warnings the user chose to treat as errors, unless the user explicitly approves the suppression.
  3. Never silently downgrade severity in .editorconfig (e.g. error to warning or none) to make a build succeed.
  4. If warnings-as-errors breaks the build — fix the code. If the fix is too large, ask the user whether to defer that warning ID.
  5. If warning volume is too large to fix in one pass — report count and categories to the user and ask which to tackle first. Do not unilaterally disable the policy.

Workflow

flowchart TD
    A[Start] --> B{New or legacy project?}
    B -->|New| C[TreatWarningsAsErrors=true immediately]
    B -->|Legacy| D[dotnet build, count warnings by ID]
    D --> E{"< 30 warnings?"}
    E -->|Yes| F[Fix all, then enable TreatWarningsAsErrors]
    E -->|No| G[Report counts to user, ask which batch first]
    G --> H[Add selected IDs to WarningsAsErrors]
    H --> I[Fix that batch, verify build]
    I --> J{More batches?}
    J -->|Yes| G
    J -->|No| F
    C --> K[Set AnalysisLevel latest-recommended]
    F --> K
    K --> L[Promote security CA3xxx/CA5xxx to error in .editorconfig]
    L --> M[Validate: build + CI green]

Read the full file on GitHub · 192 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 19d ago First seen · 192 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 36df9b70ee5a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/Orleans.RateLimiting (30 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,886 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to code-analysis, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

profiling

Use the free official .NET diagnostics CLI tools for profiling and runtime investigation in .NET repositories. USE FOR: the repo needs performance or runtime profiling for a .NET application; the user asks about slow code, high CPU, GC pressure, allocation growth, exception storms, lock. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing…

managedcode/dotnet-skills · 119 tokens

roslyn-codelens

Use when working with any .NET / C# code (.cs/.csproj/.sln/.slnx files), finding callers/references/implementations, checking compiler errors or warnings, running dotnet build for diagnostics, searching for a type/method/interface by name, inspecting DI registrations, detecting dead code or circular dependencies…

MarcelRoozekrans/roslyn-codelens-mcp · 104 tokens

cs0618-hunter

Detects and fixes CS0618 obsolete API warnings in .NET builds. The compiler is the authoritative source for what your project actually triggers — it catches transitive obsoletions, overload-resolution surprises, and project-local [Obsolete] attributes that static inspection cannot see. Pair with the repository-pinned…

joslat/maf-doctor · 85 tokens

nuget-diff-analyzer

Post-processes the repository-pinned [email protected] -- diff output into a categorised report (breaking / additive / newly-obsolete) with each finding cross-referenced to the MAF obsolete-API registry.

joslat/maf-doctor · 56 tokens

rider-search

Routing rules for code search in JetBrains Rider projects — use the Rider MCP symbol/reference/file tools instead of Bash grep. Use whenever searching for a symbol, definition, function, variable, type, or finding usages/references in a C#/.NET or Unreal C++ codebase open in Rider.

JSungMin/rider-mcp-enforcer · 60 tokens

dotnet-performance

Evidence-first performance engineering workflow for coding agents combining portable .NET diagnostics with platform-native profiling, BenchmarkDotNet, application benchmarking, statistical validation, deployment, container, graphics, and GPU procedures.

wieslawsoltes/Performance-Skill · 42 tokens