Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/managedcode/mcpgateway/dotnet-code-analysisnpx skills add managedcode/MCPGateway --skill dotnet-code-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/MCPGatewayWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.01888 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00944 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-code-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to dotnet-code-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
.NET Code Analysis
Trigger On
- the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers
- CI should fail on analyzer warnings
- the team needs
AnalysisLevelorAnalysisModeguidance - the repo needs a gradual Roslyn warning promotion strategy
Do Not Use For
- third-party analyzer selection by itself
- formatting-only work
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md - project files or
Directory.Build.props - current analyzer severity policy
Hard Rules for AI Agents
Non-negotiable. Violating these undermines the user's explicit intent.
- Never disable or remove
TreatWarningsAsErrorsorWarningsAsErrorsif the project has set them. Do not comment them out, set tofalse, wrap in a condition, or add<TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors>to make the build pass. - Never add
<NoWarn>or#pragma warning disablefor warnings the user chose to treat as errors, unless the user explicitly approves the suppression. - Never silently downgrade severity in
.editorconfig(e.g.errortowarningornone) to make a build succeed. - If warnings-as-errors breaks the build — fix the code. If the fix is too large, ask the user whether to defer that warning ID.
- If warning volume is too large to fix in one pass — report count and categories to the user and ask which to tackle first. Do not unilaterally disable the policy.
Workflow
flowchart TD
A[Start] --> B{New or legacy project?}
B -->|New| C[TreatWarningsAsErrors=true immediately]
B -->|Legacy| D[dotnet build, count warnings by ID]
D --> E{"< 30 warnings?"}
E -->|Yes| F[Fix all, then enable TreatWarningsAsErrors]
E -->|No| G[Report counts to user, ask which batch first]
G --> H[Add selected IDs to WarningsAsErrors]
H --> I[Fix that batch, verify build]
I --> J{More batches?}
J -->|Yes| G
J -->|No| F
C --> K[Set AnalysisLevel latest-recommended]
F --> K
K --> L[Promote security CA3xxx/CA5xxx to error in .editorconfig]
L --> M[Validate: build + CI green]
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 192 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 3f4abc63ac49
dotnet-code-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/MCPGateway (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,888 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to dotnet-code-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
t2i
Use the t2i CLI to generate AI images from text prompts via Microsoft Foundry providers (FLUX.2, MAI-Image-2). Activate when the user asks to generate images, automate image creation in scripts, or set up image generation for CI/CD.
performance-tracking
Status: Active Domain: Diagnostics, SLA Validation, Benchmarking Created: 2026-04-28 Author: Rachael (CLI/UX Dev).
benchmark-parity-triage
Use this when a benchmark harness exists but parity with an upstream reference implementation is unproven.
cli-wiring
Bug class: Commands implemented in packages/squad-cli/src/cli/commands/ but never routed in cli-entry.ts.
init-mode
Team initialization flow (Phase 1 proposal + Phase 2 creation).
distributed-mesh
How to coordinate with squads on different machines using git as transport.