Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/managedcode/prompterone/dotnet-code-analysisnpx skills add managedcode/PrompterOne --skill dotnet-code-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/managedcode/PrompterOneWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.01888 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00944 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-code-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- dotnet-code-analysis — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- dotnet-code-analysis — 95% identical, 2 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
.NET Code Analysis
Trigger On
- the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers
- CI should fail on analyzer warnings
- the team needs
AnalysisLevelorAnalysisModeguidance - the repo needs a gradual Roslyn warning promotion strategy
Do Not Use For
- third-party analyzer selection by itself
- formatting-only work
Inputs
- the nearest
AGENTS.md - project files or
Directory.Build.props - current analyzer severity policy
Hard Rules for AI Agents
Non-negotiable. Violating these undermines the user's explicit intent.
- Never disable or remove
TreatWarningsAsErrorsorWarningsAsErrorsif the project has set them. Do not comment them out, set tofalse, wrap in a condition, or add<TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors>to make the build pass. - Never add
<NoWarn>or#pragma warning disablefor warnings the user chose to treat as errors, unless the user explicitly approves the suppression. - Never silently downgrade severity in
.editorconfig(e.g.errortowarningornone) to make a build succeed. - If warnings-as-errors breaks the build — fix the code. If the fix is too large, ask the user whether to defer that warning ID.
- If warning volume is too large to fix in one pass — report count and categories to the user and ask which to tackle first. Do not unilaterally disable the policy.
Workflow
flowchart TD
A[Start] --> B{New or legacy project?}
B -->|New| C[TreatWarningsAsErrors=true immediately]
B -->|Legacy| D[dotnet build, count warnings by ID]
D --> E{"< 30 warnings?"}
E -->|Yes| F[Fix all, then enable TreatWarningsAsErrors]
E -->|No| G[Report counts to user, ask which batch first]
G --> H[Add selected IDs to WarningsAsErrors]
H --> I[Fix that batch, verify build]
I --> J{More batches?}
J -->|Yes| G
J -->|No| F
C --> K[Set AnalysisLevel latest-recommended]
F --> K
K --> L[Promote security CA3xxx/CA5xxx to error in .editorconfig]
L --> M[Validate: build + CI green]
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 192 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 3f4abc63ac49
dotnet-code-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository managedcode/PrompterOne (42 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,888 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
vela
Compiler-exact code search for .NET solutions - find where a symbol is defined, every reference to it, who calls it, and what a change would break. Covers C#, VB, Razor Pages, MVC views and Blazor components, which grep and every other code-intelligence tool miss. Deterministic, built on Roslyn, never modifies the…
widget-creator
Step-by-step guide for creating new widgets in the Hex1b TUI library. Use when implementing new widgets from scratch, including widget records, nodes, extension methods, theming, reconciliation, and tests.
aspire
Orchestrates Aspire distributed applications using the Aspire CLI for running, debugging, and managing distributed apps. USE FOR: aspire start, aspire stop, start aspire app, aspire describe, list aspire integrations, debug aspire issues, view aspire logs, add aspire resource, aspire dashboard, update aspire apphost.…
blazorbindings-maui-third-party
Integrate third-party .NET MAUI control libraries into BlazorBindings.Maui apps by generating Razor wrappers, registering attached properties, and bridging to native elements for imperative APIs such as popups or bottom sheets. Use when adding, updating, or troubleshooting a MAUI control package in a…
nina-repository
Repository-specific guidance for working in the N.I.N.A. codebase and NINA.sln. Use when Codex is asked to modify, review, test, debug, navigate, or explain code in this repository; touch NINA. projects, app startup/DI, profiles/settings, localization, database migrations, equipment, astrometry, imaging, plate…
csharp-dotnet
Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or shipping C# / .NET code — ASP.NET Core APIs (minimal APIs vs controllers), EF Core data access, async correctness, solution layout in .cs/.csproj/.sln. NOT a Java/Spring backend (that is spring-boot), NOT a Node/TypeScript backend (that is nestjs), NOT framework-neutral REST…