Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/christopher-buss/bedrock/grillingnpx skills add christopher-buss/bedrock --skill grillinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christopher-buss/bedrockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/christopher-buss/bedrock/grilling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christopher-buss/bedrock/grilling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christopher-buss/bedrock/grilling.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00420 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
grilling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to grilling — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Interview the user relentlessly until you reach a shared understanding. Map this as a design tree: every decision branches into the decisions that hang off it.
Work the tree in rounds. The frontier is every decision whose prerequisites are already settled: the questions you can ask now without guessing at answers you haven't heard yet. Ask the whole frontier in one round: number each question and give your recommended answer. Then wait for the user's answers before the next round.
Format a round like so:
❓ **Q1** - **<question title>**: <question body, might be multiple paragraphs, including multiple choices>
➡️ <your recommended answer>
---
❓ **Q2** - **<question title>**: <question body, might be multiple paragraphs, including multiple choices>
➡️ <your recommended answer>
Each round the user answers reshapes the tree: settled decisions push the frontier outward and unblock questions that depended on them. Recompute the frontier and ask the next round. A question whose answer depends on another question still open in this round belongs to a later round, not this one.
Finding facts is your job, never the user's. When a frontier question needs a fact from the environment (filesystem, tools, etc.), dispatch a sub-agent to find it; don't ask the user for anything you could look up yourself. Don't block on it: a running exploration is an unsettled prerequisite, so only the questions downstream of it wait for the sub-agent to report; ask the rest of the frontier now. The decisions are the user's: put each to them and wait.
The session is done when the frontier is empty: every branch of the design tree visited, nothing left silently assumed. Do not act on it until the user confirms you have reached a shared understanding.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 29 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 10ff989e7498
grilling is a skill published in the GitHub repository christopher-buss/bedrock (14 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 420 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to grilling, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
pulumi-component
Guide for authoring Pulumi ComponentResource classes. Use when creating reusable infrastructure components, designing component interfaces, setting up multi-language support, or distributing component packages.
pulumi-migrate-from-discovered-stack
Migrate a CloudFormation or ARM stack into a Pulumi stack, sourced from a stack that Pulumi Cloud's Discovery feature has already found and exposed via the discovered-stacks API. Load this skill when the user has a discovered stack in Pulumi Cloud and wants to bring its resources under Pulumi management. Do NOT load…
pulumi-overview
Use this skill for any task that creates, modifies, inspects, or destroys cloud infrastructure or SaaS configuration, from one-off CLI operations to full multi-resource projects, across providers in the Pulumi ecosystem. A typical project spans many providers (AWS or Azure or GCP, Kubernetes, Cloudflare, Auth0…
provider-upgrade
Upgrade any Pulumi provider to a newer version and reconcile the resulting diff. Use when users want to upgrade or update a provider (including editing package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, go.mod, or Pulumi.yaml to bump a provider SDK), check for breaking changes before or during an upgrade, fix resources…
pulumi-best-practices
Load when the user is writing, reviewing, or debugging Pulumi TypeScript/Python programs; asks about Output or apply() usage; wants to create ComponentResource classes; needs to refactor resources without destroying them (aliases); is setting up secrets or config; or is configuring a pulumi preview/up CI workflow.…
pulumi-arm-to-pulumi
Convert or migrate Azure ARM (Azure Resource Manager) templates, Bicep templates, or code to Pulumi, including importing existing Azure resources. This skill MUST be loaded whenever a user requests migration, conversion, or import of ARM templates, Bicep templates, ARM code, Bicep code, or Azure resources to Pulumi.