Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to christopher-buss/bedrock. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/christopher-buss/bedrock/main/.agents/skills/implement/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christopher-buss/bedrockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/christopher-buss/bedrock/implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christopher-buss/bedrock/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christopher-buss/bedrock/implement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christopher-buss/bedrock/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christopher-buss/bedrock/implement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00414 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00166 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to implement — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Implement the work described by the user in the spec or tickets.
You orchestrate: delegate code changes to builder agents.
Before delegating, read CLAUDE.md. Resume follow-ups from the recorded review and verification state.
- Build. Brief a builder with the spec, the test level for each behavior (
CLAUDE.md, "Test levels"), and the seams it may inject. It uses /tdd for new behavior and bug fixes at pre-agreed seams, runspnpm typecheckand focused tests, and commits meaningful working increments as Conventional Commits. - Simplify. Read the diff. When it repays cleanup, have a builder run /simplify for Claude models or /codex-simplify for other models.
- Review. Run /code-review once for the completed scope. Resolve its base to a fixed merge-base SHA. When the scope includes pending work, pass
git diff <baseline-sha>plus the relevant files fromgit ls-files --others --exclude-standard, and name uncommitted changes apart from the reviewed SHA. Spawn both review sub-agents as therevieweragent. - Fix. Group actionable findings and brief a fresh builder to make minimal fixes that match the surrounding code. Do not simplify or review again: confirm each finding is addressed in the diff, and verify affected behavior with typechecks and tests.
- Verify.
pnpm lint,pnpm typecheck,pnpm lint:unused,pnpm build,pnpm test, andpnpm mutate:changedmust pass. Reuse an equivalent successful hook run. Run /create-pr to create a draft PR, or update the existing PR for a follow-up.
Run through this flow fully autonomously without manual intervention. You are done when the requested scope is verified and the pull request reflects it.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +2 lines a99f9f5c83a2
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 05a22de79d7b
- 1mo ago First seen · 16 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 6d3fd9e83b8f
implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository christopher-buss/bedrock (19 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 414 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to implement, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
software-code-refactoring
Improve production code quality while preserving all existing test behavior. Commonly used for the Refactor phase of TDD red-green-refactor, but applicable to any codebase with tests. Use when production code works but needs cleanup — reducing duplication, improving naming, simplifying complexity, aligning with…
ring:running-dev-cycle
Running the backend dev cycle: implements every task in a rolling-wave plan.md (ring:writing-plans format) for a Go/TS service, driving specialist agents through Gate 0 implementation/TDD, Gate 8 parallel review, and Gate 9 validation per epic, elaborating later phases at each phase boundary. Use when starting or…
ring:instrumenting-streaming-events
Instrumenting streaming events: wires lib-streaming event emission end-to-end into a Lerian Go service via a 13-gate cycle (catalog, Builder bootstrap, Emit sites, outbox, HTTP manifest, NoopEmitter fallback, integration and chaos tests), dispatching ring:backend-go under TDD. Consumes the validated…
ring:implementing-tasks
Implementing a single planned task (Task N.M.T) end-to-end: selects the right backend agent by language and service type, drives one TDD RED->GREEN turn, then verifies coverage, lint, license headers, runtime, and delivery before handoff. Runs as Gate 0 before ring:reviewing-code. Use to drive ONE task inside an…
gentle-ai
Use Gentle AI harness discipline for Pi work: clarify first, preserve OpenSpec artifacts, use strict TDD where available, delegate through subagents when useful, and protect review workload.