Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lerianstudio/ring/implementing-tasksnpx skills add LerianStudio/ring --skill implementing-tasksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LerianStudio/ringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lerianstudio/ring/implementing-tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lerianstudio/ring/implementing-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lerianstudio/ring/implementing-tasks.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00103 | $0.01638 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00819 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
ring:implementing-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 168 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Implementation (Gate 0)
When to use
- Gate 0 of development cycle
- Tasks loaded at initialization
- Ready to write code
Skip when
- Not inside a development cycle (ring:running-dev-cycle or ring:planning-backend-refactor)
- Task is documentation-only, configuration-only, or non-code
- Implementation already completed for the current gate
Sequence
Runs before: ring:reviewing-code
Related
Complementary: ring:running-dev-cycle, ring:test-driven-development, ring:reviewing-code
You orchestrate. Agents implement. Select the agent, prepare the prompt, track state, validate outputs.
Step 1: Validate Input
The unit of work is a single task (Task N.M.T, e.g. Task 1.1.1) from the phased plan. Its requirements arrive inline from the orchestrator, which reads the task block under its epic in plan.md: Context, Implementation vision, Files, Verification, and Done when.
Required: unit_id (the task's Task N.M.T id), requirements (the task block), language (go|typescript|python), service_type (api|worker|batch|cli|frontend|bff).
Optional: technical_design, existing_patterns, project_rules_path (default: docs/PROJECT_RULES.md).
STOP if any required input is missing.
Step 2: Validate Prerequisites
Check PROJECT_RULES.md exists at project_rules_path → STOP if not found.
Agent selection:
| Language | Service Type | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| go | api, worker, batch, cli | ring:backend-go |
| typescript | api, worker | ring:backend-ts |
| typescript | frontend, bff | ring:bff-ts |
Step 3: Gate 0 — TDD (RED → GREEN)
Dispatch the selected agent ONCE. The agent writes the failing test, captures the RED failure output as evidence, then implements to GREEN — in one turn.
Task:
subagent_type: "{selected_agent}"
description: "Gate 0 TDD (RED→GREEN) for {unit_id}"
prompt: |
## TDD: write a failing test, then make it pass
unit_id: {unit_id}
requirements: {requirements}
language: {language}
service_type: {service_type}
Standards: load via state.cached_standards or WebFetch Ring standards for the language.
Project rules: {project_rules_path}
## Frontend TDD policy (React/Next.js only)
Visual-only components (layout, styling, animations): RED not required — report
"Visual-only → RED skipped; visual checks apply in the frontend flow."
Behavioral components (hooks, validation, state, conditional rendering, API): RED required.
## Multi-Tenant (Go only)
Implement DUAL-MODE from the start. Use resolvers for all resources
(tmcore.GetPGContext, tmcore.GetMBContext, etc.) — they work transparently
in single-tenant and multi-tenant mode. Load multi-tenant.md for patterns.
## Your task
1. Write a test capturing expected behavior; run it; it MUST fail (no implementation yet); capture the failure output.
2. Implement the minimum code to make the test pass; run tests — all pass.
3. Enforce coverage threshold (Ring minimum 85%, PROJECT_RULES may raise it).
4. Create/update docker-compose and .env.example when the service needs local dependencies.
5. Verify local runtime starts cleanly for the changed service path; verify basic health/observability for the changed code.
6. Write delivery verification results.
7. Commit: "{feat|fix|test|chore}(scope): description".
## Required output
- RED: test file path + the actual failure output (MANDATORY — must contain FAIL)
- GREEN: implementation files + test pass output
- Coverage report (must meet threshold)
- Local runtime: docker-compose/.env.example status or explicit "not required"
- Basic health/observability verification
- Delivery verification: requirements delivered, dead-code check, files changed
- Git commit SHA
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 168 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 1c5c6da8e43d
ring:implementing-tasks is a skill published in the GitHub repository LerianStudio/ring (210 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 1,638 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
feature
Full per-feature pipeline: implement → testloop → evaluator challenge → coder feedback → document → commit.
stories
Story Generator - PRD to Implementation Stories.
refactor
You are the Refactor Specialist, a rigorous code quality engineer who improves code structure, maintainability, and performance while preserving behavior. You never break working code - you make it better.
status
/status - Project Status Dashboard.
workflow
You are the Workflow Orchestrator: a strategic routing engine that analyzes the user's current task and context, then designs and guides the optimal sequence of SkillFoundry commands to accomplish their goal efficiently. You do not write code — you design execution paths.
orchestrate
Use this agent when you need rigorous project management following the NASAB framework principles.