Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix --skill superpowers-systematic-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christopherarter/superpowers-reasonixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix/superpowers-systematic-debugging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix/superpowers-systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix/superpowers-systematic-debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix/superpowers-systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix/superpowers-systematic-debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 77 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01830 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00732 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00366 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00183 |
Grade A, and why
superpowers-systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Systematic Debugging
Overview
Random fixes waste time, create new bugs. Quick patches mask real issue.
Core principle: ALWAYS find root cause before fixes. Symptom fixes = failure.
Break letter of process = break spirit of debugging.
The Iron Law
NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST
Phase 1 not done? Cannot propose fixes.
When to Use
ANY technical issue: test failures, production bugs, unexpected behavior, performance problems, build failures, integration issues.
ESPECIALLY when:
- Under time pressure (emergencies make guessing tempting)
- "Just one quick fix" seems obvious
- Already tried multiple fixes
- Previous fix didn't work
- Don't fully understand the issue
Don't skip when:
- Issue seems simple (simple bugs have root causes too)
- In a hurry (rushing guarantees rework)
- Manager wants it NOW (systematic beats thrashing)
The Four Phases
You MUST complete each phase before the next.
Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation
BEFORE attempting ANY fix:
-
Read Error Messages Carefully
- Don't skip errors or warnings — often contain the exact solution
- Read stack traces completely; note line numbers, file paths, error codes
-
Reproduce Consistently
- Trigger it reliably? Exact steps?
- Not reproducible → gather more data, don't guess
-
Check Recent Changes
- What changed that could cause this? (
git diff, recent commits, new deps, config)
- What changed that could cause this? (
-
Gather Evidence in Multi-Component Systems
WHEN system has multiple components (CI → build → signing, API → service → database), BEFORE proposing fixes, add diagnostic instrumentation at each boundary:
For EACH component boundary: - Log what data enters the component - Log what data exits the component - Verify environment/config propagation Run once to gather evidence showing WHERE it breaks THEN investigate that specific componentExample (multi-layer system):
echo "=== Secrets available in workflow ===" if [ -n "${IDENTITY:-}" ]; then echo "IDENTITY: SET"; else echo "IDENTITY: UNSET"; fi echo "=== Env vars in build script ===" printenv IDENTITY >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "IDENTITY in environment" || echo "IDENTITY not in environment" echo "=== Keychain state ===" security find-identity -vThis reveals which layer fails (secrets → workflow ✓, workflow → build ✗).
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 9dd0778ebb35
- 1mo ago First seen · 176 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 9a991b0e57c4
superpowers-systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository christopherarter/superpowers-reasonix (102 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,830 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cherry-assistant-guide
A guide for looking up Cherry Studio's product details and diagnosing problems such as connection failures, setup errors, and runtime issues.
cherry-electron-dev
Develop, fix, profile, and test PRs in a tracked Cherry Studio Electron instance. Use for implementation, UI and interaction work, runtime debugging, DevTools inspection, performance analysis, and interactive PR verification with a test report. Reuse a verified workspace instance and manage its lifetime according to…
cherry-studio-feedback
A guide for handling Cherry Studio bug reports, interface problems, user-experience issues, and feature suggestions.
plankton-code-quality
Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.
gke-workload-scaling-troubleshooting
Diagnoses GKE HorizontalPodAutoscaler (HPA) failures — metrics showing as , FailedGetResourceMetric / FailedGetScale / FailedComputeMetricsReplicas events, missing Pod resource requests, custom/external metrics-pipeline breakage (FailedGetExternalMetric / FailedGetCustomMetric, unavailable metrics adapter…
bigquery-troubleshooting
Provides diagnostic workflows and step-by-step root-cause analysis procedures for actively broken, failing, or slow BigQuery jobs, execution graph and query plan stage bottlenecks, system performance issues, or unexpectedly expensive workloads. Use when interpreting symptoms, isolating bottlenecks, diagnosing cost…