Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christyjacob4/claude-tricksnpx agentmods add skills/christyjacob4/claude-tricks/auto-researchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/christyjacob4/claude-tricks/auto-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christyjacob4/claude-tricks/auto-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christyjacob4/claude-tricks/auto-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/christyjacob4/claude-tricks/auto-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/christyjacob4/claude-tricks/auto-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00170 | $0.02630 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00085 | $0.01315 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00526 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00263 |
Grade A, and why
auto-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 266 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auto-Research
You are an autonomous researcher. Given a codebase with a measurable metric, you systematically experiment with changes, keep what improves the metric, discard what doesn't, and repeat indefinitely until stopped.
The core insight: with a fixed time budget per experiment and a single metric to optimize, you can run dozens of experiments per hour. The human sleeps; you research.
Phase 1: Understand the Problem
Before running anything, you need to understand four things:
1. The metric
What single number are you optimizing? Lower or higher is better? Examples:
val_bpb(lower is better) for language modelsaccuracy(higher is better) for classifierslatency_ms(lower is better) for performance optimizationscore(higher is better) for game-playing agents
If there's no clear single metric, work with the user to define one. Multi-metric optimization is possible but harder — prefer a single number when you can.
2. The search space
What files/code can you modify? What's off-limits? Typically:
- Modifiable: The training script, model code, hyperparameters, architecture
- Read-only: Evaluation harness, data loading, metric computation, infrastructure
The evaluation code being read-only is important — it keeps experiments comparable. If you change how results are measured mid-run, everything before that point becomes incomparable.
3. The run command
How do you execute one experiment? This should be a single command that:
- Runs the experiment (training, benchmark, etc.)
- Outputs the metric in a parseable format
- Exits with code 0 on success, non-zero on failure
4. The compute environment
What hardware is available?
- Single local GPU: Run experiments sequentially
- Multiple local GPUs: Run experiments in parallel, one per GPU (use
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES) - Remote machines via SSH: Run experiments in parallel across machines
Detect the environment early. For local GPUs:
nvidia-smi --list-gpus | wc -l
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 266 lines · 170 tokens per session scan A 48d1b8b93500
auto-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository christyjacob4/claude-tricks (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 170 tokens to every session and 2,630 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
cran-extrachecks
Prepare R packages for CRAN submission by checking for common ad-hoc requirements not caught by devtools::check(). Use when: (1) Preparing a package for first CRAN release, (2) Preparing a package update for CRAN resubmission, (3) Reviewing a package to ensure CRAN compliance, (4) Responding to CRAN reviewer feedback.…
mirai
Help users write correct R code for async, parallel, and distributed computing using mirai. Use when users need to run R code asynchronously or in parallel, write mirai code with correct dependency passing, set up parallel workers, convert from future or parallel, use miraimap, integrate with Shiny or promises, or…
r-cran-status
Look up an R package's live status on cran.r-project.org - submission/review state (queue, human review, waiting, archived, past version's fate) or R CMD check results (OK/NOTE/WARN/ERROR per platform). Use for "what's the CRAN status of X", "did X get accepted/rejected", "is X passing CRAN checks", "when was version…
paper-opportunity-radar
Run a cumulative daily or retrospective sweep of research papers on a chosen topic, audit their claims, methods, integrity signals, and independent support, then identify overlooked but feasible project or business opportunities in a detailed source-grounded report. Use when asked to monitor papers every day, mine…
literature-review
Find, verify, and synthesize STEM literature across every field — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Treats journal articles, arXiv/preprints, and conference proceedings as first-class; grounds every claim in a retrieved source, never fabricates DOIs, checks for…
figure-composer
Compose one publication-grade multi-panel figure. Entry from a one-line claim + data refs, OR from an existing figure via deriveoutlinetask(png). Runs a per-figure loop: outline (12-col grid, per-panel ask + labelbudget) → fan-out one Task subagent per panel (each loads figure-style) → tile + stamp letters →…