Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add chriswayneh/local-mcp-toolbox --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chriswayneh/local-mcp-toolboxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chriswayneh/local-mcp-toolbox/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chriswayneh/local-mcp-toolbox/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chriswayneh/local-mcp-toolbox/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chriswayneh/local-mcp-toolbox/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chriswayneh/local-mcp-toolbox/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00042 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00017 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00008 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00004 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Skill
- Check that every new tool validates input bounds and approved roots.
- Verify unit and integration test coverage for error paths.
- Confirm documentation tables match the registered tool names.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 6 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b88a48992a8c
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository chriswayneh/local-mcp-toolbox (0 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 42 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-24.
Other skills, from other repositories
knowledge-audit
Review and clean up stored memories — find duplicates, contradictions, stale entries, and consolidate.
ai-harness-review
Review a repository or project for AI harness security engineering safeguards. Checks architectural documentation, mechanical constraints, testing, review processes, and AI-specific safeguards. Maps findings to NIST AI RMF, OWASP, CUSTODY, and LASM.
design-review
Five-dimension design audit (frontend UI/UX · server data-model & flow · endpoint spec · daemon-runtime/SDK & local-cache-first · built-in skill/agent-role), executed by a NON-implementing agent. Every dimension gets a verdict; N/A only with a stated reason. A dimension the design silently skipped must be surfaced as…
codebase-design
Design maintainable module interfaces, review scoped code changes, and simplify implementations with behavioral verification. Use for code review, cleanup, testability, and module design work.
release-pr-review
Review pass on an open release PR (release/ → main) — the step between git-wrapup and release-and-publish when a project releases in gated release PR mode. Reads the PR's commit range through the code-simplifier lens plus a correctness review, verifies whatever an automated reviewer left on the PR, lands fixes as…
address-review
Read PR review comments from GitHub, evaluate, address, and reply.