Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/chrono-meta/forge-harness/convergence-loopnpx skills add chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill convergence-loopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/chrono-meta/forge-harness/convergence-loop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/chrono-meta/forge-harness/convergence-loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/chrono-meta/forge-harness/convergence-loop.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00122 | $0.02208 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00061 | $0.01104 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00442 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00221 |
Grade A, and why
convergence-loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
convergence-loop — Universal Convergence Loop Gate Reinforcement
A single pass declaration is hard to trust. A fix exposes new FAILs, and round 2 catches what round 1 missed. convergence-loop assigns a "truly passed" criterion to any gate.
Triggers
/convergence-loop- "convergence-loop", "how many rounds do we need", "not sure if it really passed"
- "suspicious of single-pass", "run until it passes", "keep verifying until clean"
- "single pass isn't enough", "need another round", "the fix might have introduced new issues"
- Auto-proposed: when the same artifact receives a FAIL verdict 2+ times in the same session (observable: 2nd FAIL on identical scope)
Origin
Extracted from a recurring "single-pass gate is hard to trust" pattern observed across multiple hub workflows. The canonical reference is:
harvest-loopextract→attack→synthesize cycle: pattern extraction → attack → synthesis → the repeating structure must run until convergence
When the same structure recurs across gates, it is a skill.
Applicable Targets
| Applicable Gate | Example |
|---|---|
| Skill diagnostic gate | harness-doctor + apex-review |
| Session harvest loop | harvest-loop extract→attack→synthesize cycle |
| External asset audit | steel-quench Wave 1~N |
| Domain-specific quality gate | Plug in any project-defined FAIL→FIX checkpoint |
| Any FAIL→FIX repeating structure | User-defined gate |
Pipeline Structure
[Input] gate name + pass criteria + max rounds N (default 3)
│
▼
Round 1
│ Execute gate
│ → All items pass: ✅ Round 1 passed → Round 2 (verification)
│ → FAIL occurs: List FAIL items → Execute FIX → Round 2
│
▼
Round N (N ≥ 2)
│ Re-execute same gate (with FIX applied + search for new FAILs)
│ → All items pass AND no FIX was applied in response to THIS round:
│ ✅ Declare truly passed ← the only terminating exit
│ → All items pass BUT you fixed something this round (any severity):
│ the fix is unverified → Round N+1
│ → New FAIL: List → FIX → Round N+1
│
▼
│ → FAILs remain after N rounds: "Structural redesign required" → Escalate
│ → Rounds clean but each keeps producing fixes: the fixes are manufacturing the
│ findings → REDUCE THE DESIGN, then re-run (steel-quench §Convergence Criteria 4)
│
▼ (if not converged within N rounds)
Escalation
→ Classify root cause: ambiguous criteria / FIX capability limit / gate design flaw
→ Output recommended action
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 197 lines · 122 tokens per session scan A a388832ce871
convergence-loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository chrono-meta/forge-harness (14 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 122 tokens to every session and 2,208 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
reconcile
Cross-reference a paper against the collection. Finds which cited papers are already collected, which are new leads, which collection papers cite this one, and reconciles all cross-references bidirectionally. Run on a single paper directory or use --all for the entire collection.
adjudicate
Systematically adjudicate disagreements across a paper collection. Produces ruthless verdicts on who was wrong, what supersedes what, and what the best current understanding is. Organized by topic clusters with actionable replacement values for implementation.
author-context
Create a propstore context for one paper with CEL assumptions, parameters, and perspective. Every claim extracted from the paper will reference this context. Required before extract-claims if the paper does not already have one.
author-rules
Author the DeLP rule artifacts (strict, defeasible, properdefeater, blockingdefeater) encoding a paper's stated argument structure. Runs after register-predicates.
extract-claims
Extract propositional claims from a paper directory into the propstore source branch using pks source propose-claim.
paper-retriever
Retrieve a scientific paper PDF given an arxiv URL, DOI, or paper title. Downloads to papers/ directory. Handles open-access retrieval (arxiv direct, Chrome print-to-pdf for publisher-direct HTML, Unpaywall, title-based open-repository search); for paywalled papers it hands off to whichever paper-retriever- access…