security-review

security-review is a skill for Claude Code from Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources. It costs 35 tokens per session (2,864 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing application security, covering common risks such as broken access control, weak encryption, and injection attacks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess web applications against the OWASP Top 10, a widely used list of common web security risks.
Why use it?
It gives code reviews a consistent way to look for vulnerabilities in permissions, input handling, authentication, and secrets.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Part of the vibeworks-library plugin — 34 skills, 21 commands, 33 agents, 3 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess web applications against the OWASP Top 10, a widely used list of common web security risks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources --skill security-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install vibeworks-library, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 34 skills, 21 commands, 33 agents, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,864 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.02864
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.01146
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00573
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00286

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 12f7e0499190, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-review scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

const response = await fetch(req.query.url);

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

const { exec } = require('child_process');
plugins/vibeworks-library/skills/security-review/SKILL.md · 375 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 375 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Security Review

OWASP Top 10 (2021)

Use this as a baseline checklist when reviewing any application for security vulnerabilities.

A01: Broken Access Control

Users acting outside their intended permissions.

// VULNERABLE: No authorization check
app.get('/api/users/:id', async (req, res) => {
  const user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [req.params.id]);
  res.json(user);
});

// FIXED: Verify the requesting user has permission
app.get('/api/users/:id', authenticate, async (req, res) => {
  if (req.user.id !== req.params.id && req.user.role !== 'admin') {
    return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Forbidden' });
  }
  const user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [req.params.id]);
  res.json(user);
});

A02: Cryptographic Failures

  • Use TLS 1.2+ for all data in transit. Hash passwords with bcrypt (cost 12+) or argon2.
  • Never use MD5 or SHA-1 for password hashing. Encrypt data at rest with AES-256-GCM.

A03: Injection

# VULNERABLE: SQL injection via string concatenation
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '{user_input}'")

# FIXED: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = %s", (user_input,))

A04: Insecure Design

  • Rate limit authentication endpoints. Use CAPTCHA for public forms.
  • Apply least privilege. Threat model before building, not after.

A05: Security Misconfiguration

  • Disable directory listing. Remove default credentials and demo accounts.
  • Disable verbose errors in production. Review cloud IAM policies.

A06: Vulnerable and Outdated Components

npm audit          # Node.js
pip-audit          # Python
bundle audit       # Ruby

A07: Identification and Authentication Failures

  • Enforce strong password policies (length over complexity). Account lockout after repeated failures.
  • MFA for sensitive operations. Invalidate sessions on logout and password change.

A08: Software and Data Integrity Failures

Read the full file on GitHub · 375 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 375 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 12f7e0499190

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 2,864 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (makes network calls, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens