Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources --skill security-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resourcesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/claude-code-community-ireland/claude-code-resources/security-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.02864 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.01146 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00573 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00286 |
Grade A, and why
security-review scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
const response = await fetch(req.query.url); Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
const { exec } = require('child_process'); How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 375 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Review
OWASP Top 10 (2021)
Use this as a baseline checklist when reviewing any application for security vulnerabilities.
A01: Broken Access Control
Users acting outside their intended permissions.
// VULNERABLE: No authorization check
app.get('/api/users/:id', async (req, res) => {
const user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [req.params.id]);
res.json(user);
});
// FIXED: Verify the requesting user has permission
app.get('/api/users/:id', authenticate, async (req, res) => {
if (req.user.id !== req.params.id && req.user.role !== 'admin') {
return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Forbidden' });
}
const user = await db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [req.params.id]);
res.json(user);
});
A02: Cryptographic Failures
- Use TLS 1.2+ for all data in transit. Hash passwords with bcrypt (cost 12+) or argon2.
- Never use MD5 or SHA-1 for password hashing. Encrypt data at rest with AES-256-GCM.
A03: Injection
# VULNERABLE: SQL injection via string concatenation
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '{user_input}'")
# FIXED: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = %s", (user_input,))
A04: Insecure Design
- Rate limit authentication endpoints. Use CAPTCHA for public forms.
- Apply least privilege. Threat model before building, not after.
A05: Security Misconfiguration
- Disable directory listing. Remove default credentials and demo accounts.
- Disable verbose errors in production. Review cloud IAM policies.
A06: Vulnerable and Outdated Components
npm audit # Node.js
pip-audit # Python
bundle audit # Ruby
A07: Identification and Authentication Failures
- Enforce strong password policies (length over complexity). Account lockout after repeated failures.
- MFA for sensitive operations. Invalidate sessions on logout and password change.
A08: Software and Data Integrity Failures
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 375 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 12f7e0499190
security-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Claude-Code-Community-Ireland/claude-code-resources (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 2,864 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (makes network calls, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…