Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cnfeat/top-pm-skills --skill test-strategy-docgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cnfeat/top-pm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/test-strategy-doc)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/test-strategy-doc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/test-strategy-doc/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/test-strategy-doc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cnfeat/top-pm-skills/test-strategy-doc.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01576 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00788 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00315 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
test-strategy-doc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Strategy Document Skill
Produces a complete test strategy from a feature spec, PRD, or system description — covering scope, test types, risk areas, coverage requirements, and a prioritised test case outline.
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- Feature or system being tested (paste a spec, PRD, or describe it in plain English)
- Tech stack (language and framework — e.g. TypeScript + React, Python + FastAPI)
- Existing test coverage (e.g. "we have unit tests but no E2E tests", "we use Jest + Playwright already", or "starting from scratch")
- Deployment cadence (e.g. continuous deployment / weekly releases / quarterly — affects what must be automated vs. manual)
- Risk level (low / medium / high / critical — affects depth and coverage requirements)
- Timeline (when does this need to ship — affects prioritisation)
- Team context (who is doing the testing — developers / dedicated QA / both)
Output Format
1. Test Scope
In scope:
- [Specific functionality being tested]
- [Integration points covered]
- [User-facing flows included]
Out of scope:
- [What is deliberately not tested here — and why]
- [Dependencies owned by other teams]
Assumptions:
- [What the test strategy assumes is true — e.g. mocked services, test data availability]
2. Risk Assessment
Identify the highest-risk areas first — these drive depth and coverage:
| Area | Risk Level | Why | Test Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| [e.g. Payment processing] | High | Money movement, regulatory | P0 — exhaustive |
| [e.g. User authentication] | High | Security boundary | P0 — exhaustive |
| [e.g. Email notifications] | Medium | External dependency | P1 — happy path + key failures |
| [e.g. UI copy changes] | Low | Visual only, reversible | P2 — smoke only |
3. Test Types and Coverage
Unit Tests
- What: Individual functions and methods in isolation
- Who writes: Developer
- Coverage target: [e.g. 80% line coverage on new code / 100% on critical paths]
- Tools: [e.g. Jest, pytest, go test]
- Focus areas for this feature: [Specific logic that needs unit coverage]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 139 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A a38861946fde
test-strategy-doc is a skill published in the GitHub repository cnfeat/top-pm-skills (48 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,576 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.