Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbook --skill paper-review-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbook/paper-review-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbook/paper-review-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbook/paper-review-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbook/paper-review-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbook/paper-review-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.02079 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01040 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00416 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00208 |
Grade A, and why
paper-review-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
14 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/citation-integrity.md 1.3 KB
- references/full-parallel-protocol.md 3.1 KB
- references/modules/academic-paper-helper.md 2.5 KB
- references/modules/citation-validator.md 2.0 KB
- references/modules/claude-scholar-ml-paper-writing.md 1.9 KB
- references/modules/latex-rhythm-refiner.md 1.9 KB
- references/modules/paper-self-review.md 2.2 KB
- references/modules/review-response.md 1.8 KB
- references/modules/writing-anti-ai.md 2.0 KB
- references/p0-p2-taxonomy.md 2.1 KB
- references/parity-matrix.md 8.4 KB
- references/rebuttal-workflow.md 2.2 KB
- references/report-template.md 2.2 KB
- references/section-review-checklist.md 3.2 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 196 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A ace420437047
paper-review-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbook (443 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 2,079 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
academic-paper-expert
An academic writing guide for planning, drafting, reviewing, and polishing research papers. It covers common paper sections, literature reviews, abstracts, and APA or GB/T citation formats.
science-writing-expert
A science-communication writing guide that explains scientific ideas, technology reviews, and research news in everyday language. It uses analogies and step-by-step explanations while marking uncertainty and correcting common misunderstandings.
scientific-problem-selection
Evaluate and prioritize research questions by importance, novelty, tractability, evidence, resources, ethics, and falsifiability.
survey-generator
Compile a structured literature survey on any AI/ML topic. Agent curates a research bundle (taxonomy + sections + bibliography of real papers) from a public anchor resource, then a chosen LLM generates the survey artifact. Output target is a wiki page (markdown), not a one-off HTML — survey lands in /derived/surveys/…
grad-mixed-methods
Design and conduct mixed methods research using convergent, explanatory sequential, or exploratory sequential strategies with genuine integration of qualitative and quantitative strands. Use this skill when the user needs to choose a mixed methods design, integrate qualitative and quantitative data at design, methods…
grad-narrative
Apply narrative research methods to understand human experience through stories, analyzing narrative structure, temporality, and meaning-making in life stories and oral histories. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze how people construct meaning through storytelling, examine narrative structure and plot…