Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cockroachdb/cockroach. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cockroachdb/cockroach/master/.claude/skills/drt-analyze/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cockroachdb/cockroachWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cockroachdb/cockroach/drt-analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cockroachdb/cockroach/drt-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cockroachdb/cockroach/drt-analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cockroachdb/cockroach/drt-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cockroachdb/cockroach/drt-analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 102 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 291 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00149 | $0.05468 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00060 | $0.02187 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.01094 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00547 |
Grade A, and why
drt-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 469 lines · 149 tokens per session scan A 1068b10f578c
drt-analyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository cockroachdb/cockroach (32,591 stars, last pushed 7d ago), with no licence file. It adds 149 tokens to every session and 5,468 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sq
Guides use of the sq CLI to query SQL databases and tabular files with SLQ (sq's jq-like query language) or native SQL, manage sources, choose output formats, and run inspect, diff, and table commands. Use when the user mentions sq, SLQ, wrangling CSV/Excel/JSON/DB data, cross-source joins, or command-line data…
squix
Run SQL queries across databases (Postgres, MySQL, SQLite, etc.) via the squix CLI. Use for running named queries, exploring schema, or parameterized queries. Always use -f for non-interactive output.
accounting-software-selection
Scores shortlisted accounting packages against 57 evidence-backed fields, emitted as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for choosing accounting software.
admin-access-register
Admin account register: system, main and backup admin, seats, plan, 2FA, shared logins and access-review dates, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for access reviews.
access-matrix
Access matrix of role-by-module permissions, with per-role scope, confidentiality level and SME tier, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for access reviews.
accounting-audit-system-builder
Routes an accounting or audit request to the right module skill, from software selection through monthly closing, asking only what is missing. Use for books of accounts or audit files.