A code-review workflow that examines changes for bugs, regressions, security risks, missing tests, and behavior that does not match the intended result.

Reviewing pull requests, diffs, changed files, test coverage, and pre-merge risks.

It focuses review on problems that could affect users or maintenance, with evidence and file locations to support each finding.

code-review — Skill for Claude Code and Codex by CodeInfinity1/Stram

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add CodeInfinity1/Stram --skill code-review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CodeInfinity1/Stram

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codeinfinity1/stram/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/codeinfinity1/stram/code-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codeinfinity1/stram/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codeinfinity1/stram/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/codeinfinity1/stram/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/codeinfinity1/stram/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 401 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00032	$0.00401
Opus 5.5	$0.00013	$0.00160
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00006	$0.00080
Haiku 4.5	$0.00003	$0.00040

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 737cdaadce2a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/software-engineering/code-review/SKILL.md · 66 lines

What it actually says

Code Review

Purpose

Act as a reviewer, not a summarizer. Prioritize defects, behavioral regressions, security issues, missing tests, and risky assumptions.

When To Use

Use when the user asks for review, PR review, diff review, bug hunt, pre-merge check, or "is this safe".

Inputs And Evidence

Git diff, changed files, tests, related docs, and intended behavior.
Line references and execution path evidence.

Tool Map

run_shell_command
read_file
search_workspace
diff_render
tool_search

Workflow

Inspect changed files and surrounding context.
Understand intended behavior and affected execution paths.
Look for concrete bugs before style concerns.
Verify whether tests cover the changed behavior.
Present findings first, ordered by severity, with file/line references.
If no issues are found, state that clearly and note residual risk.

Native Implementation Boundaries

Use Stram file/shell/diff tools.
Do not import external reference GitHub code-review scripts.
Do not use regex-only static checks as the review brain.

Safety And Approval

Do not modify code during a pure review unless the user asks.
Avoid exposing private code beyond the workspace.
Keep comments actionable and grounded.

Verification

Findings require specific evidence.
Test gaps should name the missing behavior.
Avoid speculative issues without a plausible failure mode.

Failure Modes

Leading with a summary instead of defects.
Reporting style nits while missing behavioral bugs.
Reviewing only the diff and missing an affected caller.

References

Shortlist item: code-review.
Related user preference: review stance means findings first.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

1mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 737cdaadce2a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository CodeInfinity1/Stram (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 401 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Code review Security ai-agent ai-agents ai-tools desktop-automation desktop-automation-software desktop-automation-windows

omh-verification-gate

This is an OMH verification-gate workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 79 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

omh-refactor-plan

This is an OMH refactor-plan workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 100 tokens

codex-adversarial-review

Use this skill to conduct aggressive, adversarial code reviews on git changes, branches, or PRs to detect critical edge cases, race conditions, security holes, and data loss risks. Triggers: user mentions "adversarial review", "break the code", "find vulnerabilities", "security audit PR", "race condition check", "ship…

WrongStack/WrongStack · 83 tokens

generic-fullstack-code-reviewer

Review full-stack code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, input validation, GPU-accelerated animations, and design system consistency. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.

travisjneuman/.claude · 64 tokens

pr-review

Comprehensive PR review across six dimensions — cost impact, environment drift, ownership gaps, SOC 2 compliance, deprecated API / version hygiene, and rollback feasibility. Each mode inspects the diff and current file state, reports findings with severity, and recommends concrete fixes. Use when preparing a PR for…

nitinjain999/platform-skills · 81 tokens