oh-my-hermes is an operating layer for Hermes Agent that organizes requests into workflows for planning, research, creation, coding handoffs, operations, and project memory. Hermes users run these workflows through the desktop app, CLI, or messenger app, while the catalogue add-ons extend its native capabilities.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-verification-gategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rlaope/oh-my-hermesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-verification-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-verification-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-verification-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-verification-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/rlaope/oh-my-hermes/omh-verification-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.02392 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00957 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00239 |
Grade A, and why
omh-verification-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verification Gate
This is an OMH verification-gate workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
Why This Exists
verification-gate gives OMH a deterministic evidence surface before done/merge claims, inspired by ECC-style gates but rebuilt around OMH's prepared-versus-observed contract.
Do Not Use When
- The user asks for visual render QA; use
omh-visual-qa. - The user asks for production release readiness beyond verification commands; use
omh-production-audit. - The user wants a bug-first code review of a diff; use
omh-code-review.
Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: verification-gate 이 PR 머지 전에 build/lint/test/docs/CI 증거를 정리해서 PASS 가능한지 봐줘.
- Expected behavior: Prepare verification_matrix/v1, record observed_check_results/v1, and issue PASS/HOLD/BLOCK with missing evidence.
- Why: The user asks for claim verification across command and CI evidence.
Bad example:
- Prompt: verification-gate 테스트 안 돌렸지만 준비됐다고 해줘.
- Expected behavior: Return HOLD/BLOCK and list missing or stale checks instead of claiming readiness.
- Why: A verification gate is useful only if planned checks and observed results stay separate.
Completion Checklist
- The scenario, expected behavior, observed result, and pass/fail basis are named.
- Proposed fixes are separated from observed QA evidence.
- Missing or failed verification routes back to plan, fix, or a narrower test.
Recovery Notes
- If the expected behavior is unclear, route back to plan before running adversarial checks.
- If verification fails, return to fix or research with the failed signal instead of advancing.
When to Use
Use when Hermes must turn a change, PR, release, or claim into a concrete evidence checklist and PASS/HOLD/BLOCK verdict.
Strong routing signals: `verification-gate`, `verification gate`, `quality gate`, `release gate`, `test gate`, `build lint test`, `lint typecheck tests`, `verify before merge`, `merge readiness gate`, `generated file`, `generated artifact`, `generated output`, `source of truth`, `regenerate instead of editing`, `検証ゲート`, `品質ゲート`, `マージ前の検証`, `リリース前チェック`, `검증 게이트`, `품질 게이트`, `테스트 게이트`, `머지 전 검증`, `빌드 린트 테스트`, `验证门禁`, `质量门禁`, `合并前验证`, `发布前检查`, `verifikasi sebelum merge`, `buktikan perubahan ini sudah selesai`, `cek bukti build lint dan tes`, `pastikan semua pemeriksaan lulus sebelum merge`, `tolong validasi hasil implementasi ini`, `xác minh trước khi gộp`, `xác minh trước khi merge`, `chứng minh thay đổi này đã hoàn thành`, `kiểm tra bằng chứng build lint và kiểm thử`, `đảm bảo mọi kiểm tra đều đạt trước khi gộp`, `đảm bảo tất cả kiểm tra đạt trước khi merge`, `hãy xác thực kết quả thực hiện này`
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed d5b97746a0e3
- 3d ago Changed · +2 lines d12cc07d68fd
- 4d ago Changed cf6ca1906847
- 6d ago Changed 5c5bc79019de
- 10d ago Changed eb6440e5ba02
- 12d ago Changed · +2 lines 3217aa956775
- 25d ago Changed · +3 lines 5d7123e2c6b5
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 tokens per session e044e3d80421
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 2e53924ae259
- 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 5fd1a6ea4745
omh-verification-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository rlaope/oh-my-hermes (4,206 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 2,392 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-prs
Review a GitHub pull request in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo against the team's reviewer checklist: PR title/description conventions, linked issue, logic errors and unhandled edge cases, breaking changes, test coverage, docs updates, security (input handling), and new dependencies. Use whenever a maintainer asks…
engineer-bot-evidence
A local checker for confirming that delivery checks and supporting evidence belong to the current software version. It does not contact Git, continuous-integration systems, or the internet.
review
Review a small code change for correctness and missing tests.
api-test-suite-builder
Generate API tests from routes and contracts for authentication, validation, pagination, errors, uploads, and limits in Node.js or Python projects.
nlpm-audit
Audit SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, prompts, hooks, and plugin manifests for instruction conflicts, quality, broken references, and manifest-to-disk drift.
api-design-reviewer
Use when reviewing API designs for consistency, usability, versioning, error semantics, security, backward compatibility, and developer experience before implementation or release.