Cindy is an open-source local AI agent that combines coding harnesses, language models, tools, memory, and skills to complete work across files, applications, browsers, computers, and phones. Its desktop and mobile client lets users switch between Claude Code, Codex, other models, and connected services while keeping task context continuous. The catalogue instructions relate to operating or developing this agent.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add makecindy/cindy --skill engineer-bot-evidencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/makecindy/cindyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/makecindy/cindy/engineer-bot-evidence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makecindy/cindy/engineer-bot-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makecindy/cindy/engineer-bot-evidence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makecindy/cindy/engineer-bot-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makecindy/cindy/engineer-bot-evidence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00208 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00083 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
engineer-bot-evidence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
原创离线辅助检查
核对交付台账中的检查/证据是否属于当前版本；不调用Git、CI或网络。
输入输出示例见 templates/input.json 与 templates/contract.md。用户要求对已提供数据做本地处理时，先检查脚本，再从stdin传JSON运行：
python3 scripts/evidence_check.py < selected-input.json
脚本只用Python 3.10+标准库，不访问网络/Home，不写文件，不执行子进程。安装与打包不会执行它。成功exit0，输入结构/引用错误exit2；语义缺口在输出字段中保持可见。输入≤1MiB，最多10000条；所有示例都是合成数据。输出不是凭证、授权、测试或真实连接证明。
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 15 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A d8c74bf17e57
engineer-bot-evidence is a skill published in the GitHub repository makecindy/cindy (3,254 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 208 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-20.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-prs
Review a GitHub pull request in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo against the team's reviewer checklist: PR title/description conventions, linked issue, logic errors and unhandled edge cases, breaking changes, test coverage, docs updates, security (input handling), and new dependencies. Use whenever a maintainer asks…
develop-web-game
Use when Codex is building or iterating on a web game (HTML/JS) and needs a reliable development + testing loop: implement small changes, run a Playwright-based test script with short input bursts and intentional pauses, inspect screenshots/text, and review console errors with rendergametotext.
mobile-automation
Control Android and iOS devices, emulators and simulators — launch apps, tap, swipe, type, take screenshots, read the accessibility tree. Use when a task involves a mobile device or app, mobile UI testing, or reproducing a bug on a phone.
omh-verification-gate
This is an OMH verification-gate workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review, two modes. Strategic Matrix v4.3 (MTA-004) for arguments/plans/decisions: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Summary. Deliverable Audit for built artefacts (assignments, reports, code outputs): isolated fresh-context hunt against the brief…
ha-code-review
Hope-native review of uncommitted, staged, commit, branch, or PR changes: discover concrete regressions, independently verify candidates, and report actionable findings first without speculative noise.