Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cognitedata/builder-skills --skill flows-review-checksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cognitedata/builder-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/flows-review-checks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/flows-review-checks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/flows-review-checks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/flows-review-checks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/flows-review-checks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.06054 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.02422 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00605 |
Grade A, and why
flows-review-checks scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cognitedata/builder-skills/main/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 475 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Flows review checks (shared)
This file is the public definition of what a Flows technical review must search for in this repo, how strict each bar is, and how to score 1.1, 1.3–1.6, 2.1–2.6, 3.1.
It does not decide:
- whether you build the app
- Codespace vs local
- Jira / Zendesk / git round folders
- output paths (
reviews/code-review/…vsreviews/external-submissions/…)
The caller sets those. Then it reads this file and runs every check.
Do not edit the app. Do not “fix it now.”
Load code-quality from the same cognitedata/builder-skills repo (see hunt 1.5). Run its searches. Ignore every “fix / replace / write the file / pnpm add” instruction in that skill. Other skills (test-coverage, …) stay fixers and are not the review bar.
Caller contract
Before any command in this file:
cdto the app root (the directory withpackage.jsonandsrc/).- All greps and test/coverage commands run from that directory.
- The caller names where to write artifacts. This file only defines content.
If a search was not run, that check is not a pass.
What the caller must produce
Whatever the filenames, the review must include:
- File inventory — every
.ts/.tsxexceptnode_modules,dist,.cognite-bundles. Includevitest.config.*/vite.config.*/jest.config.*. Columns: Structure, Quality, Patterns, Tests, Notes. Then read every non-trivial production file (skip barrels, generated types, tests). - Findings — every hunt below, with hits or
none. Then must / should / nice withfile:line. - Package audit — Step 2 in this file.
- Scored report — criteria 1.1, 1.3–1.6, 2.1–2.6, 3.1, must/should/nice lists,
_Impact:_on every Must Fix.
A 1–2 on any criterion is Must Fix. 3 is Should Fix. Gaps at 4 are Nice Fix.
Step 1 — Hunt
Run every command. Do not sample src/ and stop.
1.1 Coverage and test config (criterion 1.4) — before you believe any %
Read vitest.config.*, vite.config.* (test / coverage blocks), and jest.config.*. Then:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 475 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 1ba0ca3ef853
flows-review-checks is a skill published in the GitHub repository cognitedata/builder-skills (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 6,054 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
flows-review-checks compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| flows-review-checkscognitedata/builder-skills | Skill | 6 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 86 | Claude Code |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | today | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | today | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 945 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |