Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cognitedata/builder-skills --skill test-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cognitedata/builder-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/test-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/test-coverage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/test-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cognitedata/builder-skills/test-coverage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 8 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 105 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 121 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 254 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 287 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 326 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 335 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 105 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 335 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00103 | $0.03771 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.01508 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00754 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00377 |
Grade A, and why
test-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 376 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Coverage Fix
Fix test coverage for $ARGUMENTS (or the whole app if no argument is given). This skill enforces the 80% line coverage hard gate required for Flows app approval by finding AND fixing coverage gaps. Work through every step in order.
Step 1 — Verify test framework and coverage tooling
Check that the project has a working test framework with coverage configured:
# Check for vitest or jest in package.json
grep -E "(vitest|jest)" package.json
# Check for coverage configuration
cat vitest.config.ts 2>/dev/null || cat vitest.config.js 2>/dev/null || cat jest.config.ts 2>/dev/null || cat jest.config.js 2>/dev/null
Verify:
- A test framework (Vitest or Jest) is installed and configured
- The config file has a
coveragesection (e.g.coverage: { provider: 'v8', ... }in vitest.config.ts) - A coverage reporter is configured (at least
textandlcovorjson-summary)
If coverage tooling is not configured, fix it now:
- Install the coverage provider:
pnpm add -D @vitest/coverage-v8
- Add the coverage configuration to
vitest.config.ts. Read the existing config file, then add thecoveragesection insidetest:
// vitest.config.ts — minimum coverage configuration to add
test: {
coverage: {
provider: 'v8',
reporter: ['text', 'text-summary', 'lcov'],
include: ['src/**/*.{ts,tsx}'],
exclude: [
'src/**/*.test.{ts,tsx}',
'src/**/*.spec.{ts,tsx}',
'src/**/vite-env.d.ts',
'src/main.tsx',
],
},
}
Write the updated config file. If no vitest.config.ts exists at all, create one with the full defineConfig wrapper.
Step 2 — Validate coverage scope
The 80% threshold applies to all .ts and .tsx files under src/, excluding only:
- Test files (
*.test.ts,*.test.tsx,*.spec.ts,*.spec.tsx) - Type declaration files (
vite-env.d.ts) - The entry point (
main.tsx)
Apps must not exclude pages, components, hooks, or other production code from coverage measurement.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 376 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A 585bb5015156
test-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository cognitedata/builder-skills (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 3,771 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
test-coverage compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| test-coveragecognitedata/builder-skills | Skill | 6 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 103 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | today | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 314k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | yesterday | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |