Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add coleam00/skills --skill piv-review-changesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coleam00/skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/coleam00/skills/piv-review-changes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/coleam00/skills/piv-review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/coleam00/skills/piv-review-changes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/coleam00/skills/piv-review-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/coleam00/skills/piv-review-changes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00652 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00326 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00130 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
piv-review-changes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review
Perform technical code review on recently changed files.
Core Principles
Review Philosophy:
- Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - every line should justify its existence
- Code is read far more often than it's written - optimize for readability
- The best code is often the code you don't write
- Elegance emerges from clarity of intent and economy of expression
What to Review
Start by gathering codebase context to understand the codebase standards and patterns.
Start by examining:
- CLAUDE.md
- README.md
- Key files in the core module
- Documented standards in the docs directory (and any
.claude/references/docs)
After you have a good understanding, run these commands:
git status
git diff HEAD
git diff --stat HEAD
Then check the list of new files:
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard
Read each new file in its entirety. Read each changed file in its entirety (not just the diff) to understand full context.
For each changed file or new file, analyze for:
-
Logic Errors
- Off-by-one errors
- Incorrect conditionals
- Missing error handling
- Race conditions
-
Security Issues
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- XSS vulnerabilities
- Insecure data handling
- Exposed secrets or API keys
-
Performance Problems
- N+1 queries
- Inefficient algorithms
- Memory leaks
- Unnecessary computations
-
Code Quality
- Violations of DRY principle
- Overly complex functions
- Poor naming
- Missing type hints/annotations
-
Adherence to Codebase Standards and Existing Patterns
- Adherence to standards documented in the docs directory
- Linting, typing, and formatting standards
- Logging standards
- Testing standards
Verify Issues Are Real
- Run specific tests for issues found
- Confirm type errors are legitimate
- Validate security concerns with context
Output Format
Save a new file to .claude/code-reviews/[appropriate-name].md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 115 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 1d5025ba1bf2
piv-review-changes is a skill published in the GitHub repository coleam00/skills (500 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 652 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…