Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/collibra/chip/dq-rulesnpx skills add collibra/chip --skill dq-rulesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/collibra/chipWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01245 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00622 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00249 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
dq-rules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data quality rules
A data quality rule (a "monitor") is a check attached to an existing DQ job (a dataset — a saved data-quality check on one database table). This skill covers authoring a custom rule (validate → create), inspecting it, and reading its per-run results. It does not cover creating the job itself, editing or deleting rules, or triggering job runs — a new rule is evaluated on the job's next (scheduled) run.
Rule tools: validate_data_quality_rule, create_data_quality_rule, get_data_quality_rule, get_data_quality_rule_results.
Hard rules
- Validate before you create. Always call
validate_data_quality_ruleon the rule SQL beforecreate_data_quality_rule. It checks the SQL against the source and returnsvalid: true/falseplus a message, so a malformed rule (e.g. a badSIMPLE_SQL/SQLG predicate) is caught up front.validate_data_quality_ruletakes the raw SQL — the rule does not need to exist yet. Ifvalidisfalse, fix the SQL and re-validate; do not create the rule.create_data_quality_rulehas a confirm checkpoint. Call it first withconfirmomitted/false: it returns apreview(the composed rule and its SQL) and creates nothing. Show that preview to the user, then call again withconfirm: trueto actually create. The tool enforces this — it will not write on aconfirm=falsecall.
validate_data_quality_ruleneeds discovery IDs. It requiresedgeSiteId,connectionIdandschemaName. Get them fromprepare_create_data_quality_jobfor the target job — do not guess them. (create_data_quality_rule,get_data_quality_ruleandget_data_quality_rule_resultstake only names/ids and need no discovery step.)monitorTypeisFREEFORM_SQLorSIMPLE_SQL.FREEFORM_SQLis a full SQL query;SIMPLE_SQLis a single-column predicate. Nothing else is valid.- Always give the rule a meaningful name.
monitorNameis required and is how the rule is found and reported on later. Ask the user for a name; if they don't supply one, propose a clear, descriptive name (e.g.orders_amount_not_null) and confirm it before creating — do not invent an opaque name. Names allow only letters, digits,-and_. - For
SIMPLE_SQL, ask which column the check targets and pass it ascolumnName. ForFREEFORM_SQLthe column(s) live inside the SQL, socolumnNameis not needed. - Rules require a PUSHDOWN job. If
create_data_quality_rulereturns an error mentioning the dataset is not PUSHDOWN (HTTP 422), rule creation is not allowed on that job — tell the user rather than retrying. - Read the
statusfield in every response. Branch onsuccess,validation_error, orerror. Forvalidate_data_quality_rule,status: successmeans validation ran — the verdict is the separatevalidfield. - Creating a rule does not run it. A new rule is only evaluated on the job's next run
(runs happen via the job's schedule — this skill does not trigger them). Once a run has
happened, use
get_data_quality_rule_resultsto see how the rule did.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 73 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 0e44f3e64c4e
dq-rules is a skill published in the GitHub repository collibra/chip (36 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,245 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…