Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/comeonoliver/skillshub/csharp-type-design-performancenpx skills add ComeOnOliver/skillshub --skill csharp-type-design-performancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ComeOnOliver/skillshubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/comeonoliver/skillshub/csharp-type-design-performance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/comeonoliver/skillshub/csharp-type-design-performance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/comeonoliver/skillshub/csharp-type-design-performance.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.02307 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01154 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00461 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00231 |
Grade A, and why
type-design-performance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to type-design-performance — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 400 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Type Design for Performance
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Designing new types and APIs
- Reviewing code for performance issues
- Choosing between class, struct, and record
- Working with collections and enumerables
Core Principles
- Seal your types - Unless explicitly designed for inheritance
- Prefer readonly structs - For small, immutable value types
- Prefer static pure functions - Better performance and testability
- Defer enumeration - Don't materialize until you need to
- Return immutable collections - From API boundaries
Seal Classes by Default
Sealing classes enables JIT devirtualization and communicates API intent.
// DO: Seal classes not designed for inheritance
public sealed class OrderProcessor
{
public void Process(Order order) { }
}
// DO: Seal records (they're classes)
public sealed record OrderCreated(OrderId Id, CustomerId CustomerId);
// DON'T: Leave unsealed without reason
public class OrderProcessor // Can be subclassed - intentional?
{
public virtual void Process(Order order) { } // Virtual = slower
}
Benefits:
- JIT can devirtualize method calls
- Communicates "this is not an extension point"
- Prevents accidental breaking changes
Readonly Structs for Value Types
Structs should be readonly when immutable. This prevents defensive copies.
// DO: Readonly struct for immutable value types
public readonly record struct OrderId(Guid Value)
{
public static OrderId New() => new(Guid.NewGuid());
public override string ToString() => Value.ToString();
}
// DO: Readonly struct for small, short-lived data
public readonly struct Money
{
public decimal Amount { get; }
public string Currency { get; }
public Money(decimal amount, string currency)
{
Amount = amount;
Currency = currency;
}
}
// DON'T: Mutable struct (causes defensive copies)
public struct Point // Not readonly!
{
public int X { get; set; } // Mutable!
public int Y { get; set; }
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 400 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A c861e0d36409
type-design-performance is a skill published in the GitHub repository ComeOnOliver/skillshub (63 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 2,307 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to type-design-performance, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
csharp-expert
Expert-level C# development with .NET 8+, ASP.NET Core, LINQ, async/await, and enterprise patterns. Use when the user mentions C#, .NET, ASP.NET, enterprise, or Microsoft platforms, or when the task involves Modern C#, Async/Await, LINQ, or ASP.NET Core.
stream-unity
Build, integrate, and answer how-to questions for Stream Chat and Stream Video in Unity Engine games and apps. Use for Unity / C# / MonoBehaviour project work - the Chat .unitypackage and the Video UPM package, StreamChatClient / StreamVideoClient wiring, ConnectUserAsync and tokens, channels and messages, calls and…
unity-csharp
写 Unity C# 时使用。生命周期、协程、GC、性能、序列化的实战规范。.
sf-knowledge-salesforce-developer-environment-dotnet-tipsheet
Apply Salesforce knowledge and best practices for Setting Up Your .NET Developer Environment.
dotnet-patterns
Idiomatic C# and .NET patterns, conventions, dependency injection, async/await, and best practices for building robust, maintainable .NET applications.
csharp-testing
C# and .NET testing patterns with xUnit, FluentAssertions, mocking, integration tests, and test organization best practices.