Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add comet-ml/opik-claude-code-plugin --skill opik-comparegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/comet-ml/opik-claude-code-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/comet-ml/opik-claude-code-plugin/opik-compare)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/comet-ml/opik-claude-code-plugin/opik-compare"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/comet-ml/opik-claude-code-plugin/opik-compare/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/comet-ml/opik-claude-code-plugin/opik-compare"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/comet-ml/opik-claude-code-plugin/opik-compare.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00156 | $0.03401 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00062 | $0.01360 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00680 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00340 |
Grade A, and why
opik-compare scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
import json, urllib.parse This is a copy
100% identical to opik-compare — 33 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compare — Candidate vs Baseline Over a Suite
Definition of done: two experiments on the same suite — a baseline and a candidate — read back item by item, with the per-metric deltas, the cases that went pass → fail (regressions) and fail → pass (fixes), the worst rows, a note on whether the runs are comparable, and the Opik compare-view link. If only one run exists, the done state is "baseline created — rerun after the change". If the suite can't be run or read, stop at the first genuine blocker and return exactly one next step. Aggregate scores alone are not a comparison; a verdict is not this skill's job.
Operate: run the candidate the same way the baseline was run, read both back from Opik rather than from the run's console output, name the specific cases that changed — and change no application code. The only file this skill writes is a throwaway runner outside the repo.
Inputs
The entry point is /opik-compare <suite> (run the suite now as the candidate, compare against the latest prior run), /opik-compare <experiment-A> <experiment-B> (read two existing runs, no new run), or /opik-compare right after /opik-test (that suite). Infer the rest; treat these as optional overrides:
- suite (default:
<project>-regressions, or the one/opik-testjust wrote to) · baseline (default: the most recent earlier experiment on the suite) · candidate name (default:candidate-<short git sha>) · judge model for assertions (default: the suite's / the baseline's) · runs per item (default: the suite's policy).
Ask only at a genuine, non-inferable blocker (see Blockers).
Activation — the only in-scope work
1. Resolve the suite and the baseline
import opik
client = opik.Opik()
suite = client.get_test_suite(name="<suite>", project_name="<project>")
prior = client.get_test_suite_experiments(name="<suite>", project_name="<project>") # newest first is not guaranteed — sort by created_at yourself
Baseline = the most recent prior experiment on this suite, unless the user names one. No prior experiment → this run is the baseline (step 3 still runs; status baseline_created). Two explicit experiments → skip step 3, go to step 4.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +1 lines · +10 tokens per session 0dbe6d16e887
- 4d ago First seen · 173 lines · 146 tokens per session scan A 73786774ec0e
opik-compare is a skill published in the GitHub repository comet-ml/opik-claude-code-plugin (23 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 156 tokens to every session and 3,401 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). It is 100% identical to opik-compare, differing in 33 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing-assistant
Manages testing lifecycle including unit tests, integration tests, validation, and quality assurance.
claude-bridge
Use when orchestrating multiple Claude Code chats, reading other chats' history, sending messages between chats, or searching across chat sessions. Triggers on phrases like "peer chat", "sister chat", "other chat", "cross-chat", "what is the other agent doing", "find in chats", "manager agent", "worker agent"…
mvp-readiness
Runs a structured MVP quality-gate audit covering stability, security, logging, docs, and implementation integrity. Reports pass/fail with evidence.
requirements-generator
Generates structured requirements documents with functional and non-functional requirements, Gherkin acceptance criteria, edge cases, and out-of-scope items.
test-writer
Generates comprehensive unit and integration tests for a given file or function, auto-detecting the project test framework and matching existing test style.
tools-unity-test-framework
Unity Test Framework patterns for EditMode and PlayMode tests including async testing, mocking, and test organization.