Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add comet-ml/opik-mcp --skill opik-comparegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/comet-ml/opik-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/comet-ml/opik-mcp/opik-compare)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/comet-ml/opik-mcp/opik-compare"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/comet-ml/opik-mcp/opik-compare/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/comet-ml/opik-mcp/opik-compare"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/comet-ml/opik-mcp/opik-compare.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00156 | $0.03473 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00062 | $0.01389 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00695 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00347 |
Grade A, and why
opik-compare scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
import json, urllib.parse Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- opik-compare — 100% identical, 33 lines differ
- opik-compare — 98% identical, 33 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compare — Candidate vs Baseline Over a Suite
Definition of done: two experiments on the same suite — a baseline and a candidate — read back item by item, with the per-metric deltas, the cases that went pass → fail (regressions) and fail → pass (fixes), the worst rows, a note on whether the runs are comparable, and the Opik compare-view link. If only one run exists, the done state is "baseline created — rerun after the change". If the suite can't be run or read, stop at the first genuine blocker and return exactly one next step. Aggregate scores alone are not a comparison; a verdict is not this skill's job.
Operate: run the candidate the same way the baseline was run, read both back from Opik rather than from the run's console output, name the specific cases that changed — and change no application code. The only file this skill writes is a throwaway runner outside the repo.
Inputs
The entry point is /opik-compare <suite> (run the suite now as the candidate, compare against the latest prior run), /opik-compare <experiment-A> <experiment-B> (read two existing runs, no new run), or /opik-compare right after /opik-test (that suite). Infer the rest; treat these as optional overrides:
- suite (default:
<project>-regressions, or the one/opik-testjust wrote to) · baseline (default: the most recent earlier experiment on the suite) · candidate name (default:candidate-<short git sha>) · judge model for assertions (default: the suite's / the baseline's) · runs per item (default: the suite's policy).
Ask only at a genuine, non-inferable blocker (see Blockers).
Activation — the only in-scope work
1. Resolve the suite and the baseline
import opik
client = opik.Opik()
suite = client.get_test_suite(name="<suite>", project_name="<project>")
prior = client.get_test_suite_experiments(
name="<suite>", project_name="<project>"
) # newest first is not guaranteed — sort by created_at yourself
Baseline = the most recent prior experiment on this suite, unless the user names one. No prior experiment → this run is the baseline (step 3 still runs; status baseline_created). Two explicit experiments → skip step 3, go to step 4.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evals/.gitignore 7 B
- evals/cases.yaml 2.4 KB
- evals/fixtures/regress/agent.py 1.7 KB runs code
- evals/fixtures/regress/pyproject.toml 114 B
- evals/fixtures/regress/seed.py 4.2 KB runs code
- evals/grader.py 4.9 KB runs code
- evals/HARNESS.md 3.2 KB
- evals/metrics.py 2.3 KB runs code
- evals/run_evals.py 8.6 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +15 lines 0675f445d69d
- 3d ago Changed b2f3fe93578c
- 4d ago Changed · +1 lines · +10 tokens per session 0dbe6d16e887
- 8d ago First seen · 173 lines · 146 tokens per session scan A 73786774ec0e
opik-compare is a skill published in the GitHub repository comet-ml/opik-mcp (221 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 156 tokens to every session and 3,473 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-18.
Other skills, from other repositories
quantum-circuit-verification
A local checker for deciding whether two small OpenQASM 2 quantum circuits perform the same quantum transformation. OpenQASM 2 is a text format for describing quantum circuits.
qec-memory-experiment
A local simulation workflow for testing error correction in a small surface-code quantum memory. It adds a defined error rate, samples measurement results, and uses a matching decoder to estimate logical errors.
quantum-guide-algorithms-primitives
A guide for choosing open-source quantum algorithms for common building blocks such as Grover search, amplitude estimation, and quantum Fourier transforms. Quantum algorithms use circuits that run on quantum simulators or quantum hardware.
blazemeter-api-reference
Comprehensive reference for BlazeMeter REST APIs, including authentication, identifiers, and API endpoints. Use when working with BlazeMeter APIs for (1) Understanding BlazeMeter REST API structure, (2) Authenticating API requests, (3) Obtaining identifiers (Workspace ID, Project ID, Test ID, etc.), (4) Using Test…
blazemeter-performance-testing
Comprehensive guide for BlazeMeter Performance Testing, including load configuration, reporting, JMeter configuration, Taurus, scenarios, and advanced features. Use when working with Performance tests for (1) Configuring load settings and distribution, (2) Creating and running tests (JMeter, Browser, URL/API…
blazemeter-private-locations
Comprehensive guide for BlazeMeter Private Locations, including Radar Agent, installation (Docker, Kubernetes, Helm), configuration, management, and troubleshooting. Use when working with Private Locations for (1) Installing agents (Docker, Kubernetes, Helm Chart), (2) Configuring Radar Agent for API Monitoring, (3)…