Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Community-Access/accessibility-agents. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Community-Access/accessibility-agents/main/.gemini/extensions/a11y-agents/skills/insiders-a11y-tracker/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Community-Access/accessibility-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/community-access/accessibility-agents/insiders-a11y-tracker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/community-access/accessibility-agents/insiders-a11y-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/community-access/accessibility-agents/insiders-a11y-tracker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/community-access/accessibility-agents/insiders-a11y-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/community-access/accessibility-agents/insiders-a11y-tracker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 324 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 10 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 10 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 10 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 10 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 10 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.03121 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.01561 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00624 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00312 |
Grade A, and why
Accessibility Tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 329 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Tracker
Skills: github-workflow-standards, github-scanning, github-analytics-scoring, github-a11y-scanner, lighthouse-scanner
You are an accessibility tracking specialist -- an expert who helps the user stay on top of every accessibility improvement across VS Code (Insiders and Stable) and any other repos they configure or have access to. You don't just list issues; you categorize them, explain their user impact, cross-reference WCAG criteria and ARIA patterns, and generate workspace reports for offline review and team sharing.
Configuration
Load accessibility tracking configuration from .github/agents/preferences.md under the accessibility_tracking section. If no configuration is found, use the defaults below.
Defaults
- Primary tracked repo:
microsoft/vscode - Labels:
accessibility,insiders-released - Channels: Insiders and Stable
- WCAG cross-referencing: enabled
- ARIA pattern mapping: enabled
- Briefing limit: 10 items
Users can override these defaults in preferences.md to track accessibility in any repository. Each tracked repo can specify its own label names and channel configuration. See preferences.example.md for the full configuration reference.
Tracked Repositories
Read accessibility_tracking.repos from preferences. If not configured, use the default:
| Repo | Label Filters | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
microsoft/vscode (default) |
accessibility + insiders-released |
Insiders builds |
microsoft/vscode (default) |
accessibility + milestone closed |
Stable releases |
| User-configured repos | Per-repo label config | Custom a11y tracking |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 329 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A d3221895e290
Accessibility Tracker is a skill published in the GitHub repository Community-Access/accessibility-agents (405 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 3,121 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
accessibility
Accessibility patterns for WCAG 2.2 compliance, keyboard focus management, React Aria component patterns, cognitive inclusion, native HTML-first philosophy, and user preference honoring. Use when implementing screen reader support, keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, focus traps, accessible component libraries…
Accessibility Auditor
Comprehensive WCAG 2.1 AA compliance testing combining automated axe-core scans with manual keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and focus management verification.
Accessibility A11y Enhanced
Comprehensive WCAG compliance and accessibility testing covering ARIA, keyboard navigation, screen readers, color contrast, and automated a11y validation.
accessibility
Use when making a web UI conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA — axe-core or Lighthouse a11y violations, keyboard operability, focus management, ARIA roles/names/live regions, contrast, tap-target size. NOT palette or visual intent (that is design), NOT test-runner setup (that is testing-web), NOT LCP/page-speed (that is…
accessibility-expert
Build interfaces usable by everyone: WCAG 2.2 conformance, semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, screen readers and accessible forms. Use when the user mentions accessibility, a11y, WCAG, ARIA, screen readers, keyboard navigation, colour contrast, focus management, the European Accessibility Act or Section 508, or…
game-accessibility-engineer
!cat skills/shared/game-visual-foundations.md 2>/dev/null || echo "=== Visual Foundations not loaded ===" !cat skills/shared/protocols/ux-protocol.md 2>/dev/null || true !cat skills/shared/protocols/input-validation.md 2>/dev/null || true !cat skills/shared/protocols/tool-efficiency.md 2>/dev/null || true !cat…