Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-Skills --skill speckit.reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/compnew2006/spec-kit-antigravity-skills/speckit.reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compnew2006/spec-kit-antigravity-skills/speckit.reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compnew2006/spec-kit-antigravity-skills/speckit.reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compnew2006/spec-kit-antigravity-skills/speckit.reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compnew2006/spec-kit-antigravity-skills/speckit.reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00971 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A fd56a53321f5
speckit.reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-Skills (73 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 971 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
reviewer
Get a second-opinion review from Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini) - of code (a diff, PR, working tree) or of a decision, plan, or design. Use when the user says /agy:reviewer, "have agy review this", "second opinion on my diff/PR/plan", or after finishing work and wanting an independent verifier…
nexus-query
Precise, instant code structure queries for active development — answer 'who depends on this interface before I refactor it', 'how many modules break if I change this', 'what is the real impact radius of this feature change', 'which module is the true high-coupling hotspot in this legacy codebase'. Essential before…
code-reviewer
A static code-review skill that checks whether an implementation matches its product requirements, architecture documents, task lists, and verification plans. Static review means it examines readable files and code without running the project or connecting to outside services.
agy-reviewer
Get a second-opinion review from Google's Antigravity CLI (agy staffer, fast Gemini) - of code (a diff, PR, working tree) or of a decision, plan, or design. Use when the user says /agy-reviewer, "have agy review this", "second opinion on my diff/PR/plan", or after finishing work and wanting an independent verifier…
pr-review
Address PR review comments systematically. Use when a PR has review feedback that needs to be resolved with code changes.
max
Cleans up and improves existing code without changing behavior.