Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to compozy/kb. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/compozy/kb/main/.agents/skills/refactoring-analysis/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/compozy/kbWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/compozy/kb/refactoring-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compozy/kb/refactoring-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compozy/kb/refactoring-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/compozy/kb/refactoring-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/compozy/kb/refactoring-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00416 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00166 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
refactoring-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Refactoring Analysis
Find changes that reduce demonstrated maintenance cost while preserving behavior. Name the code smell, source evidence, and concrete improvement; a textbook category without a practical consequence is not a finding.
- Resolve the scope from the request and active context. For a broad request, map the codebase and prioritize dependencies/hotspots; do not stop for confirmation merely because it exceeds 50 files. Disclose sampled or uninspected areas.
- Read the relevant sections of
references/code-smells-catalog.mdandreferences/refactoring-techniques.mdfor the candidates found. Catalog thresholds are signals, not mandatory edits or a requirement to produce findings in every category. - Trace ownership, coupling, call sites, and public boundaries. Consult
references/solid-ddd-context.mdonly for a domain-model question; ordinary code does not need a SOLID pass. - Rank confirmed opportunities by user/maintenance impact, frequency, risk, and effort. For the highest-impact items, describe the before/after behavior and owning verification. Reuse existing coverage; missing tests do not automatically require a new suite at every layer.
- A requested report defaults to
docs/_refacs/<YYYYMMDD>-<slug>.md. Adaptassets/refactoring-report-template.md; a narrow request can use a concise response. Check material citations and reasoning withchecklists/analysis-checklist.mdas applicable. - If the user requested an audit only, report findings. If they already authorized refactoring, continue the selected work without asking again. Preserve published compatibility and unrelated changes.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago First seen · 21 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 3f7d8821c8f8
refactoring-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository compozy/kb (112 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 416 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…