Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/continuedev/checks/setup-checksnpx skills add continuedev/checks --skill setup-checksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/continuedev/checksWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.02647 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01324 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00529 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00265 |
Grade A, and why
setup-checks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Set Up AI Checks
You are helping a developer set up AI Checks — markdown files that define code quality standards. Each check runs as a full AI agent on every PR — not just reading the diff, but able to read files, run commands, and use a browser. If it finds something, it fails the PR with a suggested fix. Otherwise, it passes silently.
Complete all steps below in order.
Step 1: Orient
Welcome the user. Keep it brief — one or two sentences:
We're going to set up AI checks for your repo. I'll explore your codebase, write checks tailored to your project, and get you set up to run them.
Then create a todo list for the session:
- Explore codebase & write checks
- Try a check
- Set up CI (optional)
- Commit & PR
Mark task 1 in progress.
Step 2: Git Setup
- Verify this is a git repo:
git rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null— stop if not. - Check for uncommitted changes:
git status --porcelain
If dirty, ask:
You have uncommitted changes. I'd like to stash them and create a new branch. OK?
If approved:
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD # save original branch
git stash push -m "Stashing before checks setup"
git checkout -b add-checks
Remember the original branch and whether you stashed — you'll restore later.
Step 3: Explore & Write Checks
Speed target: under 60 seconds. Stay shallow — surface patterns, don't read entire files.
Run these in parallel where possible:
Codebase scan
- Project structure, languages, frameworks, build system
- Linters, formatters, type checkers already in use
- Testing framework & patterns
- CI/CD workflows
- Contributing guidelines (CONTRIBUTING.md, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md)
PR review history (via gh CLI, skip if gh is not available)
gh pr list --state merged --limit 30 --json number,title
# For 3-5 recent PRs with review comments:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{number}/comments --jq '.[] | {body: .body, path: .path}'
Look for: what reviewers commonly flag, what linters don't catch, what areas get the most review attention.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 326 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A ead1ee1d49ec
setup-checks is a skill published in the GitHub repository continuedev/checks (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,647 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.