continue: Skill for Claude Code

Docs Style Guide

Principles

• Be concise — no filler. Make it easy to find what you're looking for
• Task-oriented — frame around what the user is trying to do, not what the product can do
• Progressive disclosure — guide from introduction to advanced use-cases. Don't throw users into the deep end
• Real examples over abstract explanations — show, don't describe
• Code snippets must be copy-pasteable — no placeholder values that silently break, no missing imports
• Prerequisites up front — don't surprise the user halfway through
• One topic per page — if you're covering two things, split it
• Link, don't repeat — reference other docs instead of duplicating content
• Scannable headings — skimming the TOC should reveal the page structure
• Show expected output — after a step, tell the user what they should see
• Consistent terminology — pick one term for a concept, use it everywhere
• Screenshots/GIFs for key product features — use visuals when they teach faster than text
• Know which type of doc you're writing — a tutorial (learning), a how-to (completing a task), a reference (looking something up), or an explanation (understanding why). Don't mix them in one page
• Tutorials should be completable — a user following every step should end up with a working result, every time
• Reference docs should be exhaustive and consistent — cover everything, use the same structure for every entry

Tone

• Don't be patronizing — the reader is a developer. Don't tell them when to use something in a "when to use X vs Y" comparison table. If the distinction matters, state it plainly at the top of the relevant section in a sentence, then move on.
• Respect the reader's time — open with the command or code, not a paragraph explaining what they're about to see. Lead with the thing, then explain.
• No personality — the docs aren't a character. Don't try to be warm, clever, or endearing. No "Let's dive in!", no "The Magic of...", no "Pro Tip:", no emoji in headings. Developers see through it instantly and it reads like marketing copy wearing a docs costume. Just be direct and clinical. The docs serve information, they don't have a relationship with the reader.
• Inline guidance over callout boxes — prefer weaving tips into the prose rather than using <Tip>, <Info>, <Warning>, etc. These components break reading flow and look heavy when overused. Reserve them for truly critical warnings (e.g. data loss, security). One per page is a good ceiling; zero is often fine.
• Examples should feel real — use realistic file paths, realistic prompts, realistic tasks. Not > Tell me about the CLI but > @tests/auth.test.ts This test started failing after the last migration.
• Examples earn their place — don't add "Example: Doing X" sections that are just English prompts in a code block. Examples are valuable when they demonstrate non-obvious syntax, flags, piping, or configuration. If the reader could figure it out from the rest of the page, skip the example.
• No "Next Steps" sections — don't end pages with a "Next Steps" or "What's Next?" section with CardGroups linking to other pages. The sidebar navigation already does this. If a link to another page is relevant, put it inline where the context is, not in a generic footer.
• Page title = sidebar title — the title in frontmatter should match the sidebar label. Drop sidebarTitle unless there's a genuine reason for them to differ. Don't stuff extra context into the page title (e.g., "Continue CLI (cn) Overview" → "Overview").
• No subtitle/description in frontmatter — don't use the description field. The opening paragraph of the page should provide whatever context is needed. Metadata subtitles add clutter and duplicate what the prose already says.