Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin/corezoid-git-contextnpx skills add corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin --skill corezoid-git-contextgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/corezoid/corezoid-ai-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin/corezoid-git-context)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin/corezoid-git-context"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin/corezoid-git-context.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00152 | $0.01883 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00941 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00377 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00188 |
Grade A, and why
corezoid-git-context scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Session Analysis — Update _ext/docs/*.md
You manage the documentation layer for the Corezoid stage in the git mirror.
Your only write surface is _ext/docs/ inside the stage directory.
You use four MCP tools: read-context-file, update-context-file,
git-pull-context, git-push-context.
Prerequisites — skip entirely if any condition is not met
Before doing anything, verify all of the following. If any check fails, log one warning line and stop — do not continue to subsequent steps.
- Stage path known — check whether the current Folder in
~/.corezoid/config.jsonhasgit_stage_pathset (git-pull-contextpopulates it after the first successful mirror sync).- If the field is empty → "Git context not configured for this stage (git_stage_path missing). Skipping context update."
- Git credentials (optional — only needed for push) — writing to
_ext/docs/works locally regardless of whether git credentials are set. Thegit-push-contextstep at the end will silently skip ifapi_login,api_secret, orgit_urlare missing from the current Folder — local commits are preserved and will be pushed when credentials become available.- Do not skip the entire context update just because credentials are absent.
- Session was substantial — at least one of:
create-processorpush-processwas actually called (not just previewed);- a new external host/API/service appeared in a process that is not yet in
dependencies.md; - an architectural decision was explicitly made (one approach chosen over another);
- an issue was found or closed during the session.
- If none of the above → "Session was informational only. No context update needed."
Step 1 — Sync git context
Call git-pull-context with no arguments. This ensures .git-context/ is
up to date before reading or writing any files. If the tool returns an error,
stop and report: "Could not sync git context: {error}. Skipping update."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 197 lines · 152 tokens per session scan A 477f1b9bf681
corezoid-git-context is a skill published in the GitHub repository corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin (73 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 152 tokens to every session and 1,883 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
watch
File sentinel that monitors the working directory for changes and marker comments, then auto-triggers appropriate skills. Poll-based via git diff against the last scan commit. Writes intake items for batch processing and routes marker actions through /do. Use for automatic reactions to file changes; do NOT use for…
review
5-pass structured code review — correctness, security, performance, readability, consistency.
live-preview
Mid-build visual verification loop. Takes screenshots of components during construction, not just after. Catches visual regressions and invisible features before they compound. Requires Playwright or similar screenshot tool.
marshal
Meta-orchestrator that takes any direction — broad, specific, or vague — and autonomously chains skills and context into actionable work. Gathers context from codebase, docs, and memory. Only asks the user when it genuinely cannot proceed. Single-session orchestrator.
wiki
Markdown-first knowledge base where the LLM acts as librarian. Ingests raw sources, compiles and interlinks topic files, self-maintains an index. No vector DB or embeddings required -- uses LLM-native navigation over structured markdown up to 400K words.
stss
Reduce defensive disclaimers, stacked hedging, and self-protective narration in proposals and decision-facing writing. Use when the user asks to rewrite or audit a proposal, plan, research contribution, executive summary, or similar text for directness. Do not use for ordinary code work or unrelated prose.