corezoid-process-tech-writer

corezoid-process-tech-writer is a skill for Claude Code from corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin. It costs 128 tokens per session (1,489 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A documentation tool for Corezoid processes, which are automated workflows made of connected processing steps. It creates readable Markdown documentation and adds descriptions to the process JSON.

In plain words
What is it for?
Documenting process parameters, outputs, errors, and step-by-step flow for team wikis, internal portals, and future product integrations.
Why use it?
Process files can be difficult for people to understand without explanations of their inputs, outputs, nodes, and errors.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the corezoid plugin — 26 skills, 1 MCP server shipped together

Good fit Documenting process parameters, outputs, errors, and step-by-step flow for team wikis, internal portals, and future product integrations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin/corezoid-process-tech-writer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin --skill corezoid-process-tech-writer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install corezoid, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 26 skills, 1 MCP server.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for corezoid-process-tech-writer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin/corezoid-process-tech-writer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin/corezoid-process-tech-writer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin/corezoid-process-tech-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin/corezoid-process-tech-writer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 128 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,489 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high YARA Match · line 3
    YARA rule matched a hack tool or exploit indicator (offensive tools, reconnaissance, privilege escalation, or exploit frameworks).
    Fix: Remove offensive tool references and exploit code. Legitimate agent skills should not contain penetration testing tools, exploit frameworks, or reconnaissance utilities.
  • high Prompt Injection · line 96
    Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
  • high Prompt Injection · line 101
    Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00128 $0.01489
Opus 5 $0.00064 $0.00745
Sonnet 5 $0.00026 $0.00298
Haiku 4.5 $0.00013 $0.00149

Measured 8d ago against content hash b8c33c0c0ce3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

corezoid-process-tech-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/corezoid/skills/corezoid-process-tech-writer/SKILL.md · 169 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Corezoid Process Tech Writer

Always produce two outputs for every process:

  1. Markdown documentation file at .processes/<name>-docs.md
  2. Enriched process JSON (same file, description fields filled in) at .processes/<name>-enriched.json

Step 0 — Load the process

If the user provides a file path, read it directly. If they provide a process name or ID, use pull-process to fetch it first.


How to extract information from the process JSON

Inputs

Read the params array. Each entry has:

  • name — parameter name
  • type — data type
  • descr — description (may be empty — infer from context)
  • flags"required" flag means mandatory; "input" = input param, "output" = output param
  • regex — validation pattern (document if non-empty)

Outputs

Find all nodes with api_rpc_reply logic in condition.logics:

  • throw_exception: false → success response — document res_data keys and types
  • throw_exception: true → error response — document what triggers it (node title, exception_reason if present)

Process flow

Walk scheme.nodes following go entries from the Start node (obj_type: 1):

  • Start → node with id matching the to_node_id in Start's go logic
  • Continue following go entries to map the happy path
  • Note branches at Condition nodes or go_if_const entries
  • Note error paths via err_node_id references

External dependencies

  • API Call nodes (api logic): extract url, method, extra_headers
  • {{env_var[@name]}} references: list all unique variable names used
  • Code nodes (api_code): look for referenced services or data transformations
  • Call Process nodes (api_rpc): extract conv_id values (called process IDs)

Output 1: Markdown documentation

Save to .processes/<process-name-in-snake-case>-docs.md.

Use this exact structure:

# <Process Title>

## Overview
<1-2 sentences: what this process does and when to call it. Be specific about the business purpose.>

## Input Parameters

| Name | Type | Required | Description |
|------|------|----------|-------------|
| field_name | string | Yes | Description from params.descr |
| optional_field | number | No | Description |

<If any field has regex validation, add a "Validation" subsection listing the rules.>

## Output

### Success response
| Field | Type | Description |
|-------|------|-------------|
| response | object | The API response body |

### Error cases
| Error | Trigger condition |
|-------|------------------|
| "Code node error" | JavaScript execution failed in the preparation step |
| "API call error" | External API returned an error or was unreachable |

## How to Call

Example `task_data` with realistic values:
​```json
{
  "field_name": "example_value",
  "optional_field": 42
}
​```

## Process Flow

1. **Start** — Entry point, receives the task
2. **<Code Node title>** — <plain English: what this step does>
3. **<API Call / Call Process title>** — <plain English: what is called and why>
4. **<Reply node title>** — <what is returned on success>
5. **Final** — Task stored, process complete

<For error paths, describe them after the happy path:>

**Error path (Code Node failure):** If the preparation step fails, an error reply is returned
with the exception description, and the task ends at the Error node.

## External Dependencies

| Dependency | Type | Variable / URL |
|-----------|------|----------------|
| <service name> | HTTP API | `{{env_var[@variable-name]}}` |
| <process name> | Corezoid process | ID: `<conv_id>` |

## Notes

- <Any timeouts configured via semaphors — e.g. "API call has a 30-second timeout">
- <Rate limiting (max_threads setting)>
- <Any other relevant technical notes>

Read the full file on GitHub · 169 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 169 lines · 128 tokens per session scan A b8c33c0c0ce3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

corezoid-process-tech-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository corezoid/corezoid-ai-plugin (73 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 128 tokens to every session and 1,489 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

stop-that-shit

Keep coding agents focused on requested and necessary work. Use when a request sets a read-only, answer-only, file, action, or stopping boundary; when evidence shows scope creep, speculative hardening, unnecessary hashing or dependencies, repeated audit loops, or valueless delegation; or when the user invokes Stop…

lennney/stop-that-shit · 86 tokens

stss

Reduce defensive disclaimers, stacked hedging, and self-protective narration in proposals and decision-facing writing. Use when the user asks to rewrite or audit a proposal, plan, research contribution, executive summary, or similar text for directness. Do not use for ordinary code work or unrelated prose.

lennney/stop-that-shit · 63 tokens

superloopy-clone

Use when the user asks for Superloopy clone or asks to clone, rebuild, reverse-engineer, replicate, or copy a website or page into a Superloopy-governed implementation. Triggers on "loopy clone", target URLs plus requests such as "clone this site", "rebuild this page", "make a copy of this website", "pixel-perfect…

beefiker/superloopy · 113 tokens

superloopy-loop

Use Superloopy's lightweight strict-evidence loop for Codex tasks that need durable progress, criteria, and artifact-backed completion.

beefiker/superloopy · 31 tokens

superloopy-doctor

Use when diagnosing Superloopy doctor, install, wrapper, plugin cache, hook bootstrap, bundled agents, marketplace, Codex, Claude Code, stale-version, evidence-floor, or host-wiring health problems.

beefiker/superloopy · 48 tokens

inspect-codex-trajectory

Inspect or show a local Codex task trajectory, including turns, approximate model steps, assistant messages, reasoning summaries, tool calls, failures, compaction, token usage, and timing. Use when the user asks for a trajectory, execution trace, task timeline, slow-tool analysis, visual event ledger, or live…

icesixgod/codex-trajectory · 78 tokens