Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin/simulator-meetingsnpx skills add corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin --skill simulator-meetingsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/corezoid/simulator-ai-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin/simulator-meetings)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin/simulator-meetings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin/simulator-meetings.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00383 | $0.02574 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00192 | $0.01287 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00077 | $0.00515 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00257 |
Grade A, and why
simulator-meetings scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 180 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Curated tool names (v2 server):
getForms,searchUsers,createActor,updateActor,getActor,saveAccessRules,generatePublicLink,getPublicLink,revokePublicLink,buildLink,getTranscription. Call them by these exact names. There is no dedicated "create meeting" tool — a meeting is composed from these.
Simulator.Company Meeting Specialist
A meeting is an actor of the Events system form with data.scheduleMeeting = true
(and no chatType — that would make it a chat). The actor is the room: the LiveKit/SIP
room name is the actor's id, so creating the Events actor creates the meeting.
- Participants = the actor's access-rule members (
userId), like chats/tasks — added withsaveAccessRules, not a data field.data.moderator(auserId) names the host. startDate/endDateare required and are plain unix seconds on Events.- The Events form id is per workspace — resolve via
getForms/formName="Events", never hardcode.
Read
$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/docs/entities/meetings.mdfor the full model (recurrence schema, agenda, persistent rooms, link variants) andchats.mdfor the shared Events fields.
Reply to the user in their own language.
Schedule a meeting
# 1 — resolve people (moderator / invitees)
searchUsers(query="<name>") # → userId(s)
# 2 — create the meeting (Events actor, scheduleMeeting=true, NO chatType)
createActor(
formName="Events",
title="<meeting name>",
data={ "scheduleMeeting": true,
"startDate": <startUnixSec>, # required, plain unix SECONDS
"endDate": <endUnixSec>, # required
"moderator": <hostUserId> }) # optional
# 3 — invite participants (access-rule members, by userId — creator is owner)
saveAccessRules(objType="actor", objId="<meetingId>", rules=[
{ "action":"create", "data":{ "userId": <inviteeId>, "privs":{ "view":true } } } ])
Recurring meetings
Set data.recurrence (the platform expands occurrences from it):
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 180 lines · 383 tokens per session scan A afc82f40629a
simulator-meetings is a skill published in the GitHub repository corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin (60 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 383 tokens to every session and 2,574 once invoked, about $0.0019 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
unslop
Humanize LLM output so it reads like a careful human wrote it. Subtracts AI-isms (sycophancy, tricolons, em-dash overuse, "delve"/"tapestry"/"testament", hedging stacks, tidy five-paragraph shapes), engineers burstiness and calibrated uncertainty, and preserves technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: subtle…
unslop-file
Humanize natural-language memory files (CLAUDE.md, todos, preferences, docs) by removing AI-isms and adding burstiness while preserving every code block, URL, path, command, and heading exactly. Two modes: --deterministic (fast, regex-based, no API) and LLM (default, calls Claude for rewrite). Humanized version…
unslop-commit
Rewrites commit messages so they sound like a careful human engineer wrote them. Strips AI/marketing slop ("comprehensive solution", "robust implementation", "leverage", "enhance", "seamlessly", "This commit..."). Keeps Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤72 chars (aim ≤50), imperative mood. Body only when "why"…
unslop-help
Quick-reference card for unslop modes, sub-skills, and slash commands. One-shot display, not a persistent mode. Trigger: /unslop-help, "unslop help", "what unslop commands", "how do I use unslop".
unslop-reasoning
Strip AI-slop patterns from reasoning traces (chain-of-thought, extended thinking, agent decomposition) — not final prose. Reasoning text has its own slop catalog that regular unslop doesn't target: over-explaining the question, over-hedging, over-decomposing trivial problems into 6-bullet substeps, infinite-loop…
unslop-review
Rewrites code review comments so they read like a human teammate wrote them. Cuts corporate-AI throat-clearing ("I noticed...", "I was wondering if perhaps...", "It might be worth considering..."). Each comment is direct: location, the issue, a concrete fix. Use when user says "humanize review", "de-slop PR comment"…