simulator-tasks

A task and assignment guide for Simulator.Company, where tasks are event records with separate permissions for the person doing the work, approvers, and signers.

In plain words
What is it for?
Creating tasks, orders, and directives; assigning executors; naming approvers and signers; and managing their access rules.
Why use it?
It prevents assignments from being recorded only in a title or description, which would not give the intended people the permissions they need.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin/simulator-tasks
Any agent
npx skills add corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin --skill simulator-tasks
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 404 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,573 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00404 $0.03573
Opus 5 $0.00202 $0.01786
Sonnet 5 $0.00081 $0.00715
Haiku 4.5 $0.00040 $0.00357

Measured 3d ago against content hash d11c5ab3b2ed, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

simulator-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/simulator/skills/simulator-tasks/SKILL.md · 246 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 246 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Curated tool names (v2 server): getForms, searchUsers, getUsers, createActor, getActorByRef, filterActors, saveAccessRules, getAccessRules, createReaction, getReactions. Call them by these exact names. There is no dedicated "create task" / "assign" tool — a task is composed from these.

Simulator.Company Task Specialist

In Simulator.Company a task is an actor of the Events system form with no chatType (an empty/absent chatType is what separates a task / plain event from a chat). The Events form is the same one used for calendar events, SIP meetings, and chats — chatType is what disambiguates them.

Orders / directives are tasks. A request to create an order / directive document aimed at a person — «створи наказ на Салімова про …», «склади розпорядження для …», "create an order for X to …", ru «приказ на …» — is a task, not a plain event. The addressee ("на <кого>" / "for ") is the executor: create the Events actor, then grant that person execute via saveAccessRules (step 4 below). Putting the name only in the title/description is the common mistake — without the execute rule the person is not assigned and gets no done action. Resolve the addressee's userId with searchUsers first; if other people are named to approve/sign, give them sign/ds.

If the workspace has a dedicated «наказ»/order form (with example documents), mirror an example — don't just createActor and stop. Read one existing order of that form (getActor + getAccessRules) and reproduce how it assigns the responsible person: typically an execute access rule for the addressee (saveAccessRules), and/or a responsible/executor data field on the form (a workspaceMembers dynamic-select whose value is the user id — see the actor data protocol). Set whichever the example uses, and always grant the addressee access — an order with no access rule for the person never appears in their events. Creating the actor alone is not "assigned".

A task's roles are access privileges on the task actor, not data fields:

Role Privilege How they act on the task
Executor / assignee (виконавець) execute Marks the work complete with a done reaction
Approver (хто погоджує) sign Approves with a sign reaction, or declines with reject
Legal-document signer (підпис на юр. документі) ds Applies a qualified digital signature with a ds reaction
Watcher view only Can see the task; no action

view is implied when any other privilege is set. One person can hold several roles (e.g. {execute:true, sign:true}) — that's one rule with both flags. Different people get separate rules.

There is no server-side "a task must have an executor / must be approved in order" enforcement — a task is composed from createActor + saveAccessRules + reactions, and this skill owns that discipline.

Read $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/docs/entities/tasks.md for the full model, and chats.md for the shared Events-form field list.

Reply to the user in their own language.


Read the full file on GitHub · 246 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 246 lines · 404 tokens per session scan A d11c5ab3b2ed

Subscribe to this mod's changes

simulator-tasks is a skill published in the GitHub repository corezoid/simulator-ai-plugin (60 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 404 tokens to every session and 3,573 once invoked, about $0.0020 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

unslop

Humanize LLM output so it reads like a careful human wrote it. Subtracts AI-isms (sycophancy, tricolons, em-dash overuse, "delve"/"tapestry"/"testament", hedging stacks, tidy five-paragraph shapes), engineers burstiness and calibrated uncertainty, and preserves technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: subtle…

MohamedAbdallah-14/unslop · 146 tokens

unslop-file

Humanize natural-language memory files (CLAUDE.md, todos, preferences, docs) by removing AI-isms and adding burstiness while preserving every code block, URL, path, command, and heading exactly. Two modes: --deterministic (fast, regex-based, no API) and LLM (default, calls Claude for rewrite). Humanized version…

MohamedAbdallah-14/unslop · 107 tokens

unslop-commit

Rewrites commit messages so they sound like a careful human engineer wrote them. Strips AI/marketing slop ("comprehensive solution", "robust implementation", "leverage", "enhance", "seamlessly", "This commit..."). Keeps Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤72 chars (aim ≤50), imperative mood. Body only when "why"…

MohamedAbdallah-14/unslop · 139 tokens

unslop-help

Quick-reference card for unslop modes, sub-skills, and slash commands. One-shot display, not a persistent mode. Trigger: /unslop-help, "unslop help", "what unslop commands", "how do I use unslop".

MohamedAbdallah-14/unslop · 55 tokens

unslop-reasoning

Strip AI-slop patterns from reasoning traces (chain-of-thought, extended thinking, agent decomposition) — not final prose. Reasoning text has its own slop catalog that regular unslop doesn't target: over-explaining the question, over-hedging, over-decomposing trivial problems into 6-bullet substeps, infinite-loop…

MohamedAbdallah-14/unslop · 121 tokens

unslop-review

Rewrites code review comments so they read like a human teammate wrote them. Cuts corporate-AI throat-clearing ("I noticed...", "I was wondering if perhaps...", "It might be worth considering..."). Each comment is direct: location, the issue, a concrete fix. Use when user says "humanize review", "de-slop PR comment"…

MohamedAbdallah-14/unslop · 107 tokens