ad-archive

A maintenance guide for removing completed planning documents from the working folder while retaining them in Git history. It handles tasks marked done, specifications marked shipped, and outdated product or architecture decision records.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to archive or prune finished tasks, shipped specifications, superseded product requirements, and replaced or deprecated decision records. It bases the cleanup on document status rather than age.
Why use it?
It reduces the number of old planning files that tools and developers must scan. It also checks that important decisions have been incorporated into the relevant current documentation before removal.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/corridortech/posecap/ad-archive
Any agent
npx skills add CorridorTech/PoseCap --skill ad-archive
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CorridorTech/PoseCap

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 114 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,576 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00114 $0.01576
Opus 5 $0.00057 $0.00788
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00315
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00158

Measured 2d ago against content hash 881e7d47a577, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ad-archive scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/ad-archive/SKILL.md · 99 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

<background_information> Removes plan files whose decision-record lifecycle is over. Git history retains the content; the working tree stops paying context cost on artifacts the LLM no longer needs to scan.

Three rules anchor the design:

  • No CHANGELOG.md, no archive/ subdirectory. WORKFLOW.md Rule #2 forbids changelogs in narrative documents; an archive/ subdir still expands under directory globs. Git history is the ledger; /ad-commit after /ad-archive is the breadcrumb. git log --diff-filter=D -- doc/adr/ reaches it when needed.
  • Status-driven, not age-driven. Accepted means binding regardless of age.
  • Accepted ADRs require absorption proof. Nygard's tradition treats accepted ADRs as immutable; the kit's lean-tree value justifies removal only when the ADR's substance — not just its slug citation — has been moved into a binding document. The skill enforces this by grepping the named target for the ADR's core claim before allowing git rm. </background_information>

Tasks (doc/tasks/NNNN-*.md): include if Status: done. Exclude proposed, in-progress, blocked.

Specs (doc/specs/NNNN-*.md): include if Status: shipped. Exclude draft, accepted, anything superseded by SPEC-NNNN (chain target stays).

PRDs (doc/product/PRD.md single-product or doc/product/<slug>.md multi-product): include if Status: superseded. Exclude draft, accepted.

ADRs (doc/adr/NNNN-*.md):

  • Auto-include if Status: superseded by ADR-NNNN or Status: deprecated. Chain target stays.
  • Do NOT auto-include Status: accepted. Accepted ADRs require the explicit Step 3 absorption check.

Legacy plan docs (prose files under doc/ not in adr//tasks//specs//product/; e.g. doc/v0.2-cli-plan.md): present as candidates only when the user explicitly names them. No Status: field — user judgement required.

Step 2 — Present the slate. One block per category, one line per candidate, format:

### Tasks (done) — N candidates
- doc/tasks/NNNN-slug.md   done   <created date>   "<title>"

### Specs (shipped) — N candidates
(none)

### PRDs (superseded) — N candidates
(none)

### ADRs (superseded / deprecated) — N candidates
- doc/adr/NNNN-slug.md   superseded by ADR-MMMM   <date>

Print a one-line summary tail: Total: N candidates across M categories. Hard-delete via git rm; git history retains. No CHANGELOG or archive subdir.

If a category has zero candidates: render heading and (none) — do not skip silently.

If user named legacy plan docs: render under ### Legacy plan docs (user-named) — N candidates.

Step 3 — Confirm + accepted-ADR absorption gate.

Ask the user which categories to sweep. Default phrasing: "Proceed with all auto-included candidates? Or name a subset (e.g. 'tasks only', 'tasks + specs', 'skip ADR-0019')."

If the user adds any Status: accepted ADR to the removal set, run the absorption check before accepting:

  1. Ask the user where the decision has been absorbed. Required form: <file>#<section-or-anchor> or <file>:<line> (e.g. ARCHITECTURE.md#data-flow, GUIDELINES.md§Naming, src/lib/profiles.js:23).
  2. Extract two-to-four substance keywords from the ADR's title and Decision section (not the slug — substance). Example: ADR-0004 "File-based task tracking" → keywords file-based, task tracking, doc/tasks, Markdown.
  3. Grep the absorption target for each keyword. Require at least one keyword match.
  4. If grep fails: refuse removal. Print: "ADR-NNNN absorption not verified. Substance keyword <X> not found in <target>. Absorb the rationale first (edit the binding doc), then re-run /ad-archive and re-name this ADR."
  5. If grep succeeds: add to removal set, print matched location as evidence.

Do not silently downgrade the check. The absorption rule is the design's load-bearing constraint.

Step 4 — Execute. Single git rm invocation for all confirmed files (one shell call, atomic stage):

Read the full file on GitHub · 99 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 99 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 881e7d47a577

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ad-archive is a skill published in the GitHub repository CorridorTech/PoseCap (190 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 1,576 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens