Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/corridortech/posecap/ad-archivenpx skills add CorridorTech/PoseCap --skill ad-archivegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CorridorTech/PoseCapWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00114 | $0.01576 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.00788 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00315 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
ad-archive scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<background_information> Removes plan files whose decision-record lifecycle is over. Git history retains the content; the working tree stops paying context cost on artifacts the LLM no longer needs to scan.
Three rules anchor the design:
- No
CHANGELOG.md, noarchive/subdirectory. WORKFLOW.md Rule #2 forbids changelogs in narrative documents; anarchive/subdir still expands under directory globs. Git history is the ledger;/ad-commitafter/ad-archiveis the breadcrumb.git log --diff-filter=D -- doc/adr/reaches it when needed. - Status-driven, not age-driven. Accepted means binding regardless of age.
- Accepted ADRs require absorption proof. Nygard's tradition treats accepted ADRs as immutable; the kit's lean-tree value justifies removal only when the ADR's substance — not just its slug citation — has been moved into a binding document. The skill enforces this by grepping the named target for the ADR's core claim before allowing
git rm. </background_information>
Tasks (doc/tasks/NNNN-*.md): include if Status: done. Exclude proposed, in-progress, blocked.
Specs (doc/specs/NNNN-*.md): include if Status: shipped. Exclude draft, accepted, anything superseded by SPEC-NNNN (chain target stays).
PRDs (doc/product/PRD.md single-product or doc/product/<slug>.md multi-product): include if Status: superseded. Exclude draft, accepted.
ADRs (doc/adr/NNNN-*.md):
- Auto-include if
Status: superseded by ADR-NNNNorStatus: deprecated. Chain target stays. - Do NOT auto-include
Status: accepted. Accepted ADRs require the explicit Step 3 absorption check.
Legacy plan docs (prose files under doc/ not in adr//tasks//specs//product/; e.g. doc/v0.2-cli-plan.md): present as candidates only when the user explicitly names them. No Status: field — user judgement required.
Step 2 — Present the slate. One block per category, one line per candidate, format:
### Tasks (done) — N candidates
- doc/tasks/NNNN-slug.md done <created date> "<title>"
### Specs (shipped) — N candidates
(none)
### PRDs (superseded) — N candidates
(none)
### ADRs (superseded / deprecated) — N candidates
- doc/adr/NNNN-slug.md superseded by ADR-MMMM <date>
Print a one-line summary tail: Total: N candidates across M categories. Hard-delete via git rm; git history retains. No CHANGELOG or archive subdir.
If a category has zero candidates: render heading and (none) — do not skip silently.
If user named legacy plan docs: render under ### Legacy plan docs (user-named) — N candidates.
Step 3 — Confirm + accepted-ADR absorption gate.
Ask the user which categories to sweep. Default phrasing: "Proceed with all auto-included candidates? Or name a subset (e.g. 'tasks only', 'tasks + specs', 'skip ADR-0019')."
If the user adds any Status: accepted ADR to the removal set, run the absorption check before accepting:
- Ask the user where the decision has been absorbed. Required form:
<file>#<section-or-anchor>or<file>:<line>(e.g.ARCHITECTURE.md#data-flow,GUIDELINES.md§Naming,src/lib/profiles.js:23). - Extract two-to-four substance keywords from the ADR's title and Decision section (not the slug — substance). Example: ADR-0004 "File-based task tracking" → keywords
file-based,task tracking,doc/tasks,Markdown. - Grep the absorption target for each keyword. Require at least one keyword match.
- If grep fails: refuse removal. Print:
"ADR-NNNN absorption not verified. Substance keyword
<X>not found in<target>. Absorb the rationale first (edit the binding doc), then re-run /ad-archive and re-name this ADR." - If grep succeeds: add to removal set, print matched location as evidence.
Do not silently downgrade the check. The absorption rule is the design's load-bearing constraint.
Step 4 — Execute. Single git rm invocation for all confirmed files (one shell call, atomic stage):
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 99 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 881e7d47a577
ad-archive is a skill published in the GitHub repository CorridorTech/PoseCap (190 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 1,576 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…