Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to CorridorTech/PoseCap. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CorridorTech/PoseCap/main/.agents/skills/ad-archive/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CorridorTech/PoseCapWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/corridortech/posecap/ad-archive)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/corridortech/posecap/ad-archive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/corridortech/posecap/ad-archive/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/corridortech/posecap/ad-archive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/corridortech/posecap/ad-archive.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 71 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.01576 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00046 | $0.00630 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00315 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
ad-archive scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<background_information> Removes plan files whose decision-record lifecycle is over. Git history retains the content; the working tree stops paying context cost on artifacts the LLM no longer needs to scan.
Three rules anchor the design:
- No
CHANGELOG.md, noarchive/subdirectory. WORKFLOW.md Rule #2 forbids changelogs in narrative documents; anarchive/subdir still expands under directory globs. Git history is the ledger;/ad-commitafter/ad-archiveis the breadcrumb.git log --diff-filter=D -- doc/adr/reaches it when needed. - Status-driven, not age-driven. Accepted means binding regardless of age.
- Accepted ADRs require absorption proof. Nygard's tradition treats accepted ADRs as immutable; the kit's lean-tree value justifies removal only when the ADR's substance — not just its slug citation — has been moved into a binding document. The skill enforces this by grepping the named target for the ADR's core claim before allowing
git rm. </background_information>
Tasks (doc/tasks/NNNN-*.md): include if Status: done. Exclude proposed, in-progress, blocked.
Specs (doc/specs/NNNN-*.md): include if Status: shipped. Exclude draft, accepted, anything superseded by SPEC-NNNN (chain target stays).
PRDs (doc/product/PRD.md single-product or doc/product/<slug>.md multi-product): include if Status: superseded. Exclude draft, accepted.
ADRs (doc/adr/NNNN-*.md):
- Auto-include if
Status: superseded by ADR-NNNNorStatus: deprecated. Chain target stays. - Do NOT auto-include
Status: accepted. Accepted ADRs require the explicit Step 3 absorption check.
Legacy plan docs (prose files under doc/ not in adr//tasks//specs//product/; e.g. doc/v0.2-cli-plan.md): present as candidates only when the user explicitly names them. No Status: field — user judgement required.
Step 2 — Present the slate. One block per category, one line per candidate, format:
### Tasks (done) — N candidates
- doc/tasks/NNNN-slug.md done <created date> "<title>"
### Specs (shipped) — N candidates
(none)
### PRDs (superseded) — N candidates
(none)
### ADRs (superseded / deprecated) — N candidates
- doc/adr/NNNN-slug.md superseded by ADR-MMMM <date>
Print a one-line summary tail: Total: N candidates across M categories. Hard-delete via git rm; git history retains. No CHANGELOG or archive subdir.
If a category has zero candidates: render heading and (none) — do not skip silently.
If user named legacy plan docs: render under ### Legacy plan docs (user-named) — N candidates.
Step 3 — Confirm + accepted-ADR absorption gate.
Ask the user which categories to sweep. Default phrasing: "Proceed with all auto-included candidates? Or name a subset (e.g. 'tasks only', 'tasks + specs', 'skip ADR-0019')."
If the user adds any Status: accepted ADR to the removal set, run the absorption check before accepting:
- Ask the user where the decision has been absorbed. Required form:
<file>#<section-or-anchor>or<file>:<line>(e.g.ARCHITECTURE.md#data-flow,GUIDELINES.md§Naming,src/lib/profiles.js:23). - Extract two-to-four substance keywords from the ADR's title and Decision section (not the slug — substance). Example: ADR-0004 "File-based task tracking" → keywords
file-based,task tracking,doc/tasks,Markdown. - Grep the absorption target for each keyword. Require at least one keyword match.
- If grep fails: refuse removal. Print:
"ADR-NNNN absorption not verified. Substance keyword
<X>not found in<target>. Absorb the rationale first (edit the binding doc), then re-run /ad-archive and re-name this ADR." - If grep succeeds: add to removal set, print matched location as evidence.
Do not silently downgrade the check. The absorption rule is the design's load-bearing constraint.
Step 4 — Execute. Single git rm invocation for all confirmed files (one shell call, atomic stage):
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A 881e7d47a577
ad-archive is a skill published in the GitHub repository CorridorTech/PoseCap (265 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 1,576 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
repo-sync
Manage automatic Git syncing on macOS with repo-sync. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /repo-sync.
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…