Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add CraftOS-dev/CraftBot --skill semgrepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CraftOS-dev/CraftBotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/semgrep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/semgrep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/semgrep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/semgrep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/craftos-dev/craftbot/semgrep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 167 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 167 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.02330 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00932 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00466 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00233 |
Grade A, and why
semgrep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 205 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Semgrep Security Scan
Run a Semgrep scan with automatic language detection, parallel execution via Task subagents, and merged SARIF output.
Essential Principles
- Always use
--metrics=off— Semgrep sends telemetry by default;--config autoalso phones home. Everysemgrepcommand must include--metrics=offto prevent data leakage during security audits. - User must approve the scan plan (Step 3 is a hard gate) — The original "scan this codebase" request is NOT approval. Present exact rulesets, target, engine, and mode; wait for explicit "yes"/"proceed" before spawning scanners.
- Third-party rulesets are required, not optional — Trail of Bits, 0xdea, and Decurity rules catch vulnerabilities absent from the official registry. Include them whenever the detected language matches.
- Spawn all scan Tasks in a single message — Parallel execution is the core performance advantage. Never spawn Tasks sequentially; always emit all Task tool calls in one response.
- Always check for Semgrep Pro before scanning — Pro enables cross-file taint tracking and catches ~250% more true positives. Skipping the check means silently missing critical inter-file vulnerabilities.
When to Use
- Security audit of a codebase
- Finding vulnerabilities before code review
- Scanning for known bug patterns
- First-pass static analysis
When NOT to Use
- Binary analysis → Use binary analysis tools
- Already have Semgrep CI configured → Use existing pipeline
- Need cross-file analysis but no Pro license → Consider CodeQL as alternative
- Creating custom Semgrep rules → Use
semgrep-rule-creatorskill - Porting existing rules to other languages → Use
semgrep-rule-variant-creatorskill
Output Directory
All scan results, SARIF files, and temporary data are stored in a single output directory.
- If the user specifies an output directory in their prompt, use it as
OUTPUT_DIR. - If not specified, default to
./static_analysis_semgrep_1. If that already exists, increment to_2,_3, etc.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 205 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 092472caba4d
semgrep is a skill published in the GitHub repository CraftOS-dev/CraftBot (400 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 2,330 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
development-estimation
Use when estimating time, effort, cost, or complexity for features, projects, refactors, and bug backlogs. Produces defensible estimates via triage, decomposition, risk handling, and confidence intervals, with clear assumptions and validation steps.
deck-retro
Run a fully local agent-deck retrospective over the user's own transcripts, Recall index and logs. Use when a user wants to find recurring failures or take their own finding from investigation through synthetic reproduction, a user-filed issue, a test-first fix and contributor PR handoff. Also use for weekly usage…
loop-engineering
Shared loop-engineering reference for COG skills - the agent loop, deterministic verifiers, termination conditions, in-loop context management, and named patterns. Invoke when designing or debugging a skill that iterates (search-verify-retry, scan-until-dry, fetch-retry-gate).
opik-diagnose
Surface the Opik traces worth a developer's attention, ranked by signal — Diagnostics issues first, then errors, failed tool calls, latency, regressions, and low online-eval scores. With the Opik MCP connected it lists the project's agentinsightsissue entities, offers to turn Diagnostics on when the project has it…
qa-knowledge
To run QA engineering — requirements/gap analysis, scenario & spec design, test implementation, failure triage — over the QA knowledge base.
neckbeard
Use when asked to fix, build, refactor, review, verify, or release software and the work is non-trivial — including delivering a change request through planning, gates, implementation, review, verified PR, and authorized release; continuing work started elsewhere with no packet via evidence-based position assessment…