Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cratis/verticalslices/write-specs-eventsnpx skills add Cratis/VerticalSlices --skill write-specs-eventsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Cratis/VerticalSlicesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cratis/verticalslices/write-specs-events)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cratis/verticalslices/write-specs-events"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cratis/verticalslices/write-specs-events.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01408 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00704 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00282 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
write-specs-events scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to write-specs-events — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing Event Sequence Specs with EventScenario
Use EventScenario to test event-appending behavior in-process — no Chronicle server, database, or network required. Wrap every spec file in #if DEBUG … #endif so spec code ships only in Debug. Assert the constraint name (ShouldHaveConstraintViolationFor(name)), never the message.
When to use this skill
- Testing that a command appends the correct event(s)
- Testing that a constraint correctly rejects a duplicate or conflicting append
- Testing
AppendManyfor batch event appends - Testing concurrency or error conditions in event appending
For testing read model projections or reducers, use ReadModelScenario<TReadModel> instead.
Package
dotnet add package Cratis.Chronicle.Testing
Basic structure
// In your spec file (follows BDD Establish/Because/should_ pattern)
public class when_appending_<event_name> : Specification
{
EventScenario _scenario;
IAppendResult _result;
void Establish() => _scenario = new EventScenario();
async Task Because() =>
_result = await _scenario.EventLog.Append(<eventSourceId>, new <EventType>(<args>));
[Fact] void should_be_successful() => _result.ShouldBeSuccessful();
}
Step 1 — Create the scenario
Always create a new EventScenario per test. It starts with an empty event log and sequence number zero.
var scenario = new EventScenario();
Step 2 — Seed pre-existing state (optional)
Use the fluent Given builder when the act phase depends on prior state:
await scenario.Given
.ForEventSource(authorId)
.Events(new AuthorRegistered("Jane Smith"), new BookAdded("Clean Code"));
Chain multiple ForEventSource calls to seed different event sources:
await scenario.Given
.ForEventSource(author1Id)
.Events(new AuthorRegistered("Jane Smith"));
await scenario.Given
.ForEventSource(author2Id)
.Events(new AuthorRegistered("John Doe"));
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 207 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 58cf309e9f62
write-specs-events is a skill published in the GitHub repository Cratis/VerticalSlices (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,408 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to write-specs-events, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cratis-specs-csharp
Step-by-step guidance for writing C# specs in Cratis with BDD Specification by Example — the Establish/Because/should pattern, for/when/and folder hierarchy, reusable given/ contexts, NSubstitute mocking, and the in-process scenario family. Use when writing C# unit or integration specs or structuring the for/when/and…
write-specs-events
Use this skill when asked to write tests or specs for event appending, event log behavior, constraint violations, or concurrency violations using EventScenario in a Cratis-based project. Produces infrastructure-free in-process specs using EventScenario and AppendResult Should extensions.
cratis-specs-typescript
Step-by-step guidance for writing TypeScript specs in Cratis using BDD-style Specification by Example — the given()/describe/it pattern, for/when/ folder hierarchy, reusable context classes, Sinon mocking, and Chai assertions. Use whenever writing TypeScript specs or tests, creating spec files/folders, using the…
write-specs-frontend
Use this skill to write specs for the React/TypeScript surface of a Cratis APPLICATION slice — view models, helpers, and component behavior (Vitest + Mocha-style describe/it + Sinon + Chai .should). The frontend peer to write-specs (backend). For framework @cratis/ package specs use cratis-specs-typescript instead.
all-options
Exercises every official Agent Skills field and folded scalar behavior in the bounded parser.
cratis-engineering-example
Sanitized fixture proving recursive discovery would expose an engineering skill.