Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to crbnos/carbon. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/crbnos/carbon/main/.claude/skills/error/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/crbnos/carbonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/crbnos/carbon/error)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/crbnos/carbon/error"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/crbnos/carbon/error/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/crbnos/carbon/error"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/crbnos/carbon/error.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 28 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.00503 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00201 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
error scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 4e0de4057b58
error is a skill published in the GitHub repository crbnos/carbon (2,783 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 503 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
writing-browser-e2e-tests
Playwright E2E testing standards from authoritative docs/explanation/software-engineering/automation-testing/tools/playwright/ documentation.
exploratory-testing
Guides session-based exploratory testing of a running interface or API: framing charters, choosing tours, citing a specification, contract, or design for every expected result, telling a defect from a gap, and staying non-destructive.
web-testing-exploratory-methodology
Spec-aware session-based exploratory testing methodology for swe-web-tester (exploratory charter) — charter framing, testing tours, SFDIPOT/CRUSSPIC STMPL coverage models, the test dimensions checklist, three mandatory systematic sweeps, specs-as-ground-truth comparison and spec-gap detection, defect anatomy, and the…
playwright-e2e
E2E browser testing with Playwright MCP. Use when asked to test frontend flows, verify UI behavior, navigate pages, fill forms, check visual state, or debug browser issues. Trigger words: "test E2E", "prueba de frontend", "navegar", "registrarse", "loguearse", "verificar en el navegador", "playwright", "browser test".
ux-acceptance-coordinator
Coordinate black-box, agent-driven UX acceptance journeys against a disposable EmDash admin site. Use when preparing, dispatching, verifying, or reporting a manual browser journey performed by a separate tester agent. Do not use for deterministic Playwright tests or ordinary code review.
agent-browser
Use the agent-browser CLI to exercise web interfaces, inspect rendered accessibility state, verify interactions, and capture screenshots. Use for browser-based UI testing and evidence collection. Do not use as a substitute for deterministic Playwright coverage when an automated regression test is the requested…