Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cristianmoroaica/bountyverdict --skill preflight-github-bountiesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cristianmoroaica/bountyverdictWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cristianmoroaica/bountyverdict/preflight-github-bounties)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cristianmoroaica/bountyverdict/preflight-github-bounties"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cristianmoroaica/bountyverdict/preflight-github-bounties/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cristianmoroaica/bountyverdict/preflight-github-bounties"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cristianmoroaica/bountyverdict/preflight-github-bounties.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00999 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
preflight-github-bounties scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to preflight-github-bounties — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Preflight GitHub Bounties
Use BountyVerdict as a decision gate before beginning bounty implementation. Treat its evidence as public due diligence, not as proof that a reward will be paid.
Resolve the service
- Read
https://cristianmoroaica.github.io/bountyverdict/agent-manifest.json. - Continue only when
statusisactiveandproduction_apiis an HTTPS origin. - Prefer the manifest endpoint. Otherwise search Coinbase x402 Bazaar for
BountyVerdict GitHub bounty due diligenceand require the exact service name. - Inspect the free sample, OpenAPI document, price, network, and schema before authorizing payment.
Do not attempt a purchase while the manifest says awaiting_production.
The manifest's test_api may be inspected for free samples, OpenAPI, and unpaid Base Sepolia challenges, but it is not the real-money service.
Choose a product
- Use the single verdict for one candidate. It costs $0.05 USDC.
- For 2-7 candidates, individual checks are cheaper unless ranked orchestration is worth the premium.
- Use the $0.40 portfolio for 8-10 candidates or when one ranked response and partial-failure handling materially simplify the workflow.
- Never split or disguise duplicate URLs. Submit canonical public URLs shaped like
https://github.com/owner/repository/issues/123.
Verify before paying
Make an unpaid request first and inspect the x402 challenge. Require all of these:
- HTTP status
402; - x402 v2 exact scheme;
- Base mainnet network
eip155:8453for a real purchase; - canonical Base USDC asset
0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913; - amount no greater than
50000atomic units for one verdict or400000for a portfolio; - service name
BountyVerdictorBountyVerdict Portfolio; - Bazaar method and input schema matching the intended request.
Bind the payment client to the expected network, asset, recipient, and atomic cap. Reject changed challenges. Never reveal wallet secrets, seed phrases, API keys, or payment signatures in output or logs.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 76 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 29a5688a6344
preflight-github-bounties is a skill published in the GitHub repository cristianmoroaica/bountyverdict (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 999 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to preflight-github-bounties, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ios-app-store-submit
Build, sign, and submit a Flutter/iOS app to the App Store Connect — covers Xcode archive/export, code signing (including headless-Mac keychain workarounds), the asc CLI for App Store Connect metadata automation, screenshot handoff, and final review submission. Use when asked to build and upload an iOS app, set up App…
PR Etiquette
This skill should be used when responding to maintainer review feedback, writing or reviewing PR descriptions, following up on dormant PRs, validating PR quality before submission, or deciding how to communicate with maintainers. Sibling to oss-contribution and contribution-ethics.
daily-working
End-to-end pipeline: pull a task from the project's task tracker by ID (Redmine or GitHub Issues today, more addable via a new adapter), sanity-check and impact-assess it against the codebase before touching anything, implement it with the Claude CLI, verify the result in a real browser via the Claude Chrome extension…
OSS Contribution Best Practices
This skill should be used when the user is working on open source contributions, responding to maintainer feedback, writing PR descriptions, working on issues, following up on dormant PRs, or needs guidance on open source etiquette and best practices.
Contribution Ethics
This skill should be used when writing commits, PRs, or comments that will be visible to OSS maintainers — it covers the no-AI-attribution rule, AI-tell avoidance in writing, and the situations where a human contributor should respond instead of the AI tool. Sibling to oss-contribution and pr-etiquette.
artifact-use
Use when creating, polishing, publishing, sharing, gating, or checking stats for Artifact Use artifacts through the hosted API, CLI, or MCP server. Applies to self-contained interactive HTML artifacts, single-file HTML tools, multi-file static artifacts, folders, images/PDFs, and Artifact Use admin/share workflows.…