Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add cruzs85/opencode-multiagente-local-37-iterations --skill post-write-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cruzs85/opencode-multiagente-local-37-iterationsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cruzs85/opencode-multiagente-local-37-iterations/post-write-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cruzs85/opencode-multiagente-local-37-iterations/post-write-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cruzs85/opencode-multiagente-local-37-iterations/post-write-verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cruzs85/opencode-multiagente-local-37-iterations/post-write-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cruzs85/opencode-multiagente-local-37-iterations/post-write-verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00593 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00296 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
post-write-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Post-Write Verification Checklist — para @verifier
Objetivo
Verificar que el archivo recién escrito está limpio antes de pasarlo a QA. @verifier ejecuta este checklist después de que code-writer complete el lote de escritura.
Regla obligatoria
No dar un lote por verificado hasta que los 5 puntos del checklist estén verificados.
Checklist de verificación (OBLIGATORIO)
@verifier debe leer cada archivo modificado y verificar:
1. 📦 IMPORTS
- ¿Cada import se usa al menos una vez en el cuerpo del archivo?
- Si hay imports sin usar → reportar a @code-writer para que los elimine.
2. 🧹 VARIABLES MUERTAS
- ¿Toda variable, constante o propiedad declarada se referencia en el código?
- Si hay elementos declarados pero nunca usados → reportar a @code-writer.
3. 📞 MÉTODOS PÚBLICOS
- ¿Cada método público tiene al menos un callsite potencial?
- Los métodos privados pueden no tener callsite externo (se llaman internamente).
4. 🔢 COHERENCIA ARITMÉTICA
- ¿Las operaciones matemáticas combinan variables del mismo dominio?
timestamp - lastObstacleTime→ ambos deben ser marcas de tiempo (ms)coordenadaX - velocidad→ ambos deben ser valores espaciales- Si una variable es un timestamp y la otra es una posición X → ❌ BUG
- NO mezclar timestamps con coordenadas, ni píxeles con segundos, ni metros con kilómetros.
- ¿El resultado de la operación tiene sentido en el dominio?
- Si restas dos timestamps, obtienes un delta en ms ✅
- Si restas un timestamp a una coordenada X, obtienes basura ❌
- Si usas requestAnimationFrame, considera si necesitas deltaTime.
5. 🔗 CONTRATOS
- Si el archivo consume o importa otro archivo, verifica que los nombres de métodos, tipos y propiedades coinciden EXACTAMENTE con el archivo fuente.
- Usa grep para confirmar:
grep "nombreMetodo" ruta-del-archivo-fuente.ts
Acción correctiva
Si cualquiera de los puntos falla:
- @verifier reporta el hallazgo al orquestador con archivo exacto, línea, esperado vs actual
- El orquestador delega la corrección a @code-writer
- Una vez corregido, @verifier RE-VERIFICA el archivo
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 54 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 84e0d8aa74c3
post-write-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository cruzs85/opencode-multiagente-local-37-iterations (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 593 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…