Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cubixgg/cloud-minestom. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/main/.claude/skills/scaffold-argument-mapper/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cubixgg/cloud-minestomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/scaffold-argument-mapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/scaffold-argument-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/scaffold-argument-mapper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/scaffold-argument-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/scaffold-argument-mapper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.01009 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00504 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
scaffold-argument-mapper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scaffold an ArgumentMapper
Adds a new built-in Cloud-parser → native-Minestom-Argument mapping, following the exact pattern
every existing mapper in StandardArgumentMappers already uses (see mapUuid/mapEnum/mapPlayer
for reference before writing the new one - don't invent a different shape).
Before you start
- Confirm there's a real, unambiguous native Minestom
Argumenttype for this parser. If there isn't a sane one, the parser should stay on theWord/String/StringArrayfallback (CommandTreeTranslator's own logic already does this automatically for anything with no registered mapper) - do not force a mapping that doesn't actually correspond to the parser's semantics.CLAUDE.md's anti-patterns section calls this out explicitly: a mapping that looks right but silently mismatches the parser's actual grammar is worse than the honest fallback. - If the native shape only approximates the parser's grammar (the way
DurationParser/Timedoes), that's fine — but it must be called out in a comment on the mapper method and indocs/argument-mapping.md's "Known mismatches" section, not silently coerced.
Steps
- The mapper method — in
cloud-minestom/src/main/java/gg/cubix/cloudminestom/argument/StandardArgumentMappers.java:- Add a
private static Argument<?> mapXxx(final CommandComponent<?> component, final ArgumentParser<?, T> parser)method,Tbeing the parser's actual value type. - Cast
parserto the concrete parser class if you need its configuration (bounds, mode, ...) — every existing mapper does this (seemapInteger's(IntegerParser<?>) parsercast). - Return the native
Argument<?>, built viaArgumentType.Xxx(component.name()). - Add a one-line
//comment only if there's a non-obvious why (a grammar mismatch, a Minestom-native quirk) — not a comment that just restates what the code does (CLAUDE.md).
- Add a
- Registration — add
registry.register(XxxParser.class, StandardArgumentMappers::mapXxx);toregisterAll(...), in the same class. - Unit test stub — in
cloud-minestom/src/test/java/gg/cubix/cloudminestom/argument/StandardArgumentMappersTest.java:- Add a
@Testmethod asserting the producedArgumentis the expected type (and, if the parser has options like bounds, that they made it onto the native argument) — follow the existingintegerParserMapsToIntegerHonoringBounds-style pattern.
- Add a
- Update
docs/argument-mapping.md's table in the same commit — it's meant to be kept in sync withStandardArgumentMappers's actual registered set, not left to drift. - Update
docs/spec.md§5.2's table too, with a short note indocs/roadmap.mdif this reveals a gap the spec didn't originally anticipate (see thePlayerParsermapper's own roadmap entry, P8, for the precedent on how that correction was written up).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 59 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 896dd4e091e0
scaffold-argument-mapper is a skill published in the GitHub repository cubixgg/cloud-minestom (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,009 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
11-browser-qa
Run post-review browser QA and produce short named videos for a locked happy path and sourced browser edge cases. Use when the user wants concise reviewer evidence for a web journey. Not for API, CLI, automated tests, diff review, or application fixes.
08-three-amigos
Assesses an Epic or Story through one product, delivery, or quality lens, then reconciles three caller-supplied reports. Use when the user wants to refine one before a backlog change. Not for spawning or writing.
audit-remediate
Macro workflow for auditing a single domain layer against its authoritative layer skill, applying fixes, and gating the result. Use when you need to prove a layer skill on real code, clean up an existing layer after a skill update, or verify that a layer is already compliant. Always captures a golden baseline before…
09-for-sure
Run an iterative agent loop that retries until a runnable success condition passes. Use when the user says "for sure", "keep trying until", or wants guaranteed completion against a success command. Not for one-shot tasks or uncheckable goals.
03-assert
Assert the work behaves by iterating the project's coding assertions until they pass, plus optional architecture and frontend facets. Use to validate an implementation. Not for reviewing or writing tests.
08-debug
Reproduce and fix a known bug, or find an unknown root cause by hypothesis validation. Use when the user wants to fix a bug, find why something breaks, or reopen a stuck investigation. Not for building a feature or reviewing a diff.