Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cubixgg/cloud-minestom. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/main/.claude/skills/verify-roadmap-item/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cubixgg/cloud-minestomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01033 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
verify-roadmap-item scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify a roadmap item before checking it off
CONTRIBUTING.md is explicit: a roadmap item "isn't done because it compiles - it's done when both
required testing layers pass... and, where the item calls for it, minestom-demo actually
demonstrates the behavior." This skill is the checklist that keeps that honest.
The two layers, and when each applies
Per CLAUDE.md's Testing section, anything that touches registration, parsing, suggestions,
permissions or execution needs both layers — neither substitutes for the other:
- Unit test — a fake registration sink (
Consumer<net.minestom.server.command.builder.Command>, e.g.list::add) or hand-built Cloud objects (CommandContext,CommandInput, a fakeCommandSender), no running server. TestsCommandTreeTranslator,ArgumentMapperRegistry,CloudSuggestionCallback, default permission/exception wiring, or a parser's ownparse/suggestion logic in isolation. @EnvTest—net.minestom:testing's real (headless, virtual-player) server. Proves the whole stack: registration → native parse shape → Cloud re-parse → permission check → handler → feedback, actually reaching a connectedPlayer.
A roadmap item phrased as @EnvTest in roadmap.md needs one, full stop, not just a unit test around
the pieces — that phrasing is itself a signal the item is testing an end-to-end path.
Checklist
- Read the exact roadmap item wording. It usually tells you which layer(s) it expects — an item
phrased as "Unit test: ..." vs. "
@EnvTest: ...". Don't downgrade an@EnvTestitem to a unit test because it's faster to write. - Run the actual layer(s), don't assume.
./gradlew test --tests "..."for the specific new test(s), then a full./gradlew buildbefore considering the item done — a passing new test with a broken existing one isn't done. - For an
@EnvTest, check what actually reached the client, not just that no exception was thrown — collect the relevant packet type (SystemChatPacketfor messages,TabCompletePacket/ClientTabCompletePacketfor suggestions) and assert on its real content. A test that only asserts "didn't crash" can pass while the feature is silently broken. - Watch for
net.minestom.testing'sCollector#collect()footgun: calling.collect()(or.assertCount(...)/any otherCollectormethod that calls it internally) more than once on the same tracker silently unsubscribes it from further packets after the first call. Debug prints that call.collect()mid-test will make later assertions see fewer packets than actually arrived, which looks exactly like a registration or exception-handling bug. If a test behaves strangely across multiple sequentialexecute(...)calls, check this before suspecting the library. - If this is a
minestom-democommand, manually verify it too (./gradlew :minestom-demo:run, or a throwaway@EnvTestin a temporarily-added test source set — see anyminestom-democommit fromdocs/roadmap.mdP11 for the pattern: addnet.minestom:testingas a temporary test dependency, write the check, verify, then revert the temporary test scaffolding sinceminestom-demohas no permanent test suite by design, perspec.md§13). - Only then check the box in
docs/roadmap.md, in the same commit as the implementation (CONTRIBUTING.md) — never ahead of actually running the verification above.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 62 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A f08ba62fe53d
verify-roadmap-item is a skill published in the GitHub repository cubixgg/cloud-minestom (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,033 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
11-browser-qa
Run post-review browser QA and produce short named videos for a locked happy path and sourced browser edge cases. Use when the user wants concise reviewer evidence for a web journey. Not for API, CLI, automated tests, diff review, or application fixes.
08-three-amigos
Assesses an Epic or Story through one product, delivery, or quality lens, then reconciles three caller-supplied reports. Use when the user wants to refine one before a backlog change. Not for spawning or writing.
09-for-sure
Run an iterative agent loop that retries until a runnable success condition passes. Use when the user says "for sure", "keep trying until", or wants guaranteed completion against a success command. Not for one-shot tasks or uncheckable goals.
03-assert
Assert the work behaves by iterating the project's coding assertions until they pass, plus optional architecture and frontend facets. Use to validate an implementation. Not for reviewing or writing tests.
08-debug
Reproduce and fix a known bug, or find an unknown root cause by hypothesis validation. Use when the user wants to fix a bug, find why something breaks, or reopen a stuck investigation. Not for building a feature or reviewing a diff.
06-test
Write and iterate tests until they pass, or validate a user journey end to end in the browser. Use when the user wants to add coverage, find what's untested, or walk a flow. Not for auditing test health or debugging a failure.