Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cubixgg/cloud-minestom. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/main/.claude/skills/verify-roadmap-item/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cubixgg/cloud-minestomWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01033 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00413 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
verify-roadmap-item scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify a roadmap item before checking it off
CONTRIBUTING.md is explicit: a roadmap item "isn't done because it compiles - it's done when both
required testing layers pass... and, where the item calls for it, minestom-demo actually
demonstrates the behavior." This skill is the checklist that keeps that honest.
The two layers, and when each applies
Per CLAUDE.md's Testing section, anything that touches registration, parsing, suggestions,
permissions or execution needs both layers — neither substitutes for the other:
- Unit test — a fake registration sink (
Consumer<net.minestom.server.command.builder.Command>, e.g.list::add) or hand-built Cloud objects (CommandContext,CommandInput, a fakeCommandSender), no running server. TestsCommandTreeTranslator,ArgumentMapperRegistry,CloudSuggestionCallback, default permission/exception wiring, or a parser's ownparse/suggestion logic in isolation. @EnvTest—net.minestom:testing's real (headless, virtual-player) server. Proves the whole stack: registration → native parse shape → Cloud re-parse → permission check → handler → feedback, actually reaching a connectedPlayer.
A roadmap item phrased as @EnvTest in roadmap.md needs one, full stop, not just a unit test around
the pieces — that phrasing is itself a signal the item is testing an end-to-end path.
Checklist
- Read the exact roadmap item wording. It usually tells you which layer(s) it expects — an item
phrased as "Unit test: ..." vs. "
@EnvTest: ...". Don't downgrade an@EnvTestitem to a unit test because it's faster to write. - Run the actual layer(s), don't assume.
./gradlew test --tests "..."for the specific new test(s), then a full./gradlew buildbefore considering the item done — a passing new test with a broken existing one isn't done. - For an
@EnvTest, check what actually reached the client, not just that no exception was thrown — collect the relevant packet type (SystemChatPacketfor messages,TabCompletePacket/ClientTabCompletePacketfor suggestions) and assert on its real content. A test that only asserts "didn't crash" can pass while the feature is silently broken. - Watch for
net.minestom.testing'sCollector#collect()footgun: calling.collect()(or.assertCount(...)/any otherCollectormethod that calls it internally) more than once on the same tracker silently unsubscribes it from further packets after the first call. Debug prints that call.collect()mid-test will make later assertions see fewer packets than actually arrived, which looks exactly like a registration or exception-handling bug. If a test behaves strangely across multiple sequentialexecute(...)calls, check this before suspecting the library. - If this is a
minestom-democommand, manually verify it too (./gradlew :minestom-demo:run, or a throwaway@EnvTestin a temporarily-added test source set — see anyminestom-democommit fromdocs/roadmap.mdP11 for the pattern: addnet.minestom:testingas a temporary test dependency, write the check, verify, then revert the temporary test scaffolding sinceminestom-demohas no permanent test suite by design, perspec.md§13). - Only then check the box in
docs/roadmap.md, in the same commit as the implementation (CONTRIBUTING.md) — never ahead of actually running the verification above.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 62 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A f08ba62fe53d
verify-roadmap-item is a skill published in the GitHub repository cubixgg/cloud-minestom (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,033 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
mirrord-prev-env
Help users create and manage mirrord preview environments — running a modified service as an isolated pod in a shared Kubernetes cluster, scoped by an environment key and HTTP/queue traffic filtering, so teams can validate and review changes against real traffic without affecting live services. Use when a developer…
mirrord-chaos
Help users chaos test their app with mirrord: inject artificial latency or connection errors into a mirrord session's outgoing traffic via per-session chaos rules managed with the mirrord chaos CLI. Use when a user wants to add latency or delay to outgoing connections or a dependency (e.g. a slow database), simulate…
testing-mwaa-workflow
Tests Amazon MWAA workflow execution end-to-end: trigger a run and monitor it to completion for Provisioned (Python DAG, via Airflow REST API) and Serverless (YAML workflow, via StartWorkflowRun). Verifies the artifact is deployed and parse-ready, triggers with confirmation, polls to terminal state, and on failure…
lovable
Lovable MCP tool usage — deploy projects, message agent, test with agent-browser. Minimize credits by delegating to local repo.
agent-browser
Browser automation via Chrome/Chromium CDP — open, snapshot, click, screenshot. For testing web apps, mobile layouts, and automated interactions without Playwright/Puppeteer.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.