cloud-minestom: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/verify-roadmap-item/SKILL.md

verify-roadmap-item is a skill for Claude Code from cubixgg/cloud-minestom. It costs 70 tokens per session (1,033 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A testing checklist for confirming that a documentation or roadmap feature works through both isolated unit tests and the project’s real server test layer.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps verify changes involving registration, parsing, suggestions, permissions, or execution from individual components through a connected player.
Why use it?
It prevents features from being marked complete merely because the code compiles.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md.

This is cubixgg/cloud-minestom's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on cloud-minestom itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything cloud-minestom configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to cubixgg/cloud-minestom. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/main/.claude/skills/verify-roadmap-item/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cubixgg/cloud-minestom

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verify-roadmap-item

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for verify-roadmap-item

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cubixgg/cloud-minestom/verify-roadmap-item.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 70 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,033 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00070 $0.01033
Opus 5 $0.00035 $0.00517
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00207
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00103

Measured 9d ago against content hash f08ba62fe53d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verify-roadmap-item scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/verify-roadmap-item/SKILL.md · 62 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 62 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Verify a roadmap item before checking it off

CONTRIBUTING.md is explicit: a roadmap item "isn't done because it compiles - it's done when both required testing layers pass... and, where the item calls for it, minestom-demo actually demonstrates the behavior." This skill is the checklist that keeps that honest.

The two layers, and when each applies

Per CLAUDE.md's Testing section, anything that touches registration, parsing, suggestions, permissions or execution needs both layers — neither substitutes for the other:

  1. Unit test — a fake registration sink (Consumer<net.minestom.server.command.builder.Command>, e.g. list::add) or hand-built Cloud objects (CommandContext, CommandInput, a fake CommandSender), no running server. Tests CommandTreeTranslator, ArgumentMapperRegistry, CloudSuggestionCallback, default permission/exception wiring, or a parser's own parse/suggestion logic in isolation.
  2. @EnvTestnet.minestom:testing's real (headless, virtual-player) server. Proves the whole stack: registration → native parse shape → Cloud re-parse → permission check → handler → feedback, actually reaching a connected Player.

A roadmap item phrased as @EnvTest in roadmap.md needs one, full stop, not just a unit test around the pieces — that phrasing is itself a signal the item is testing an end-to-end path.

Checklist

  1. Read the exact roadmap item wording. It usually tells you which layer(s) it expects — an item phrased as "Unit test: ..." vs. "@EnvTest: ...". Don't downgrade an @EnvTest item to a unit test because it's faster to write.
  2. Run the actual layer(s), don't assume. ./gradlew test --tests "..." for the specific new test(s), then a full ./gradlew build before considering the item done — a passing new test with a broken existing one isn't done.
  3. For an @EnvTest, check what actually reached the client, not just that no exception was thrown — collect the relevant packet type (SystemChatPacket for messages, TabCompletePacket/ClientTabCompletePacket for suggestions) and assert on its real content. A test that only asserts "didn't crash" can pass while the feature is silently broken.
  4. Watch for net.minestom.testing's Collector#collect() footgun: calling .collect() (or .assertCount(...)/any other Collector method that calls it internally) more than once on the same tracker silently unsubscribes it from further packets after the first call. Debug prints that call .collect() mid-test will make later assertions see fewer packets than actually arrived, which looks exactly like a registration or exception-handling bug. If a test behaves strangely across multiple sequential execute(...) calls, check this before suspecting the library.
  5. If this is a minestom-demo command, manually verify it too (./gradlew :minestom-demo:run, or a throwaway @EnvTest in a temporarily-added test source set — see any minestom-demo commit from docs/roadmap.md P11 for the pattern: add net.minestom:testing as a temporary test dependency, write the check, verify, then revert the temporary test scaffolding since minestom-demo has no permanent test suite by design, per spec.md §13).
  6. Only then check the box in docs/roadmap.md, in the same commit as the implementation (CONTRIBUTING.md) — never ahead of actually running the verification above.

Read the full file on GitHub · 62 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 62 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A f08ba62fe53d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verify-roadmap-item is a skill published in the GitHub repository cubixgg/cloud-minestom (5 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,033 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

11-browser-qa

Run post-review browser QA and produce short named videos for a locked happy path and sourced browser edge cases. Use when the user wants concise reviewer evidence for a web journey. Not for API, CLI, automated tests, diff review, or application fixes.

ai-driven-dev/framework · 55 tokens

08-three-amigos

Assesses an Epic or Story through one product, delivery, or quality lens, then reconciles three caller-supplied reports. Use when the user wants to refine one before a backlog change. Not for spawning or writing.

ai-driven-dev/framework · 50 tokens

09-for-sure

Run an iterative agent loop that retries until a runnable success condition passes. Use when the user says "for sure", "keep trying until", or wants guaranteed completion against a success command. Not for one-shot tasks or uncheckable goals.

ai-driven-dev/framework · 53 tokens

03-assert

Assert the work behaves by iterating the project's coding assertions until they pass, plus optional architecture and frontend facets. Use to validate an implementation. Not for reviewing or writing tests.

ai-driven-dev/framework · 39 tokens

08-debug

Reproduce and fix a known bug, or find an unknown root cause by hypothesis validation. Use when the user wants to fix a bug, find why something breaks, or reopen a stuck investigation. Not for building a feature or reviewing a diff.

ai-driven-dev/framework · 52 tokens

06-test

Write and iterate tests until they pass, or validate a user journey end to end in the browser. Use when the user wants to add coverage, find what's untested, or walk a flow. Not for auditing test health or debugging a failure.

ai-driven-dev/framework · 52 tokens