Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add cukas/claudes-ai-buddies/plugin install claudes-ai-buddiesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/cukas/claudes-ai-buddies/forge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cukas/claudes-ai-buddies/forge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cukas/claudes-ai-buddies/forge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/cukas/claudes-ai-buddies/forge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/cukas/claudes-ai-buddies/forge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02604 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01302 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00521 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00260 |
Grade C, and why
forge scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
rm -rf "$FORGE_DIR" How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 266 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/forge — Evolutionary Multi-AI Code Forge (v2)
Three AI engines independently implement the same task, compete on automated fitness tests, then the best solution is refined through critique-based synthesis. Claude is a pure orchestrator — it dispatches, scores, and judges but never competes.
How to invoke
Direct forge — user specifies a focused task:
/forge "Add NaN guard to scoring" --fitness "npx jest"
Optional flags:
--timeout SECS— override the safety cap (default: 600s from config keyforge_timeout)--async— run in background, continue conversation--engines claude,codex— limit which engines compete (default: all available)--starter codex— override which engine runs first
Using forge inside existing planning workflows
/forge works as a tool within any plan — /build-guard, /plan-guarded, plan mode, or any task list.
The [forge] tag
When building a plan, Claude can tag tasks:
[forge]— algorithmic, tricky, multiple valid approaches- No tag or
[direct]— straightforward, Claude handles normally
What to tag [forge]
- Algorithms, scoring logic, data transformations
- Race condition fixes, concurrency patterns
- Performance-critical code paths
- Anything with multiple valid approaches where three perspectives help
What NOT to tag [forge]
- Types, imports, config, UI layout, wiring
- Boilerplate, glue code — one obvious answer
- Anything without a runnable fitness test
Step-by-step workflow
Phase 0: Setup
- Parse args. Extract the task,
--fitnesscommand, optional--timeout,--async,--engines,--starter. - Detect engines. Source lib.sh and use the dynamic registry:
source "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/lib.sh"
AVAILABLE=$(ai_buddies_available_buddies) # CSV: "claude,codex,gemini,aider,..."
FORGE_TIMEOUT=$(ai_buddies_forge_timeout)
Any registered buddy with an installed binary will participate.
- Create forge directory:
FORGE_ID="$(date +%s)-${RANDOM}"
FORGE_DIR="/tmp/ai-buddies-${CLAUDE_SESSION_ID:-default}/forge-${FORGE_ID}"
mkdir -p "$FORGE_DIR"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 266 lines · 22 tokens per session scan C 7afd450fc396
forge is a skill published in the GitHub repository cukas/claudes-ai-buddies (9 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,604 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
laravel-tdd
Test-driven development for Laravel with PHPUnit and Pest, factories, database testing, fakes, and coverage targets.
browser-qa
A browser-based quality check for deployed web pages and user flows. It uses browser automation to test rendering, navigation, forms, interactions, responsive behaviour, and accessibility-related issues.
eval-harness
An evaluation framework for AI-assisted development that defines pass/fail criteria, measures pass@k reliability, and runs regression checks. Eval-driven development means testing an agent's expected behavior before and after changes, much like tests for software.
live-preview
Mid-build visual verification loop. Takes screenshots of components during construction, not just after. Catches visual regressions and invisible features before they compound. Requires Playwright or similar screenshot tool.
session-rag-eval
Run and debug Chatbox session attachment RAG model evaluation with synthetic and real long-file fixtures.
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…