Awesome Codex Plugins is a curated catalogue and marketplace of installable plugins, skills, and related resources for OpenAI Codex and ChatGPT. It helps people find, create, validate, and submit extensions for Codex workflows across its app, command-line interface, and IDE extensions. The catalogue add-ons are the plugins, skills, agents, and hooks listed or supported by this project.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill browser-qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/browser-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/browser-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/browser-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/browser-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins/browser-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01312 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00525 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00262 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
browser-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Browser QA — 自动化视觉测试与交互验证
When to Use / 用途
- After deploying a feature to staging/preview
- When you need to verify UI behavior across pages
- Before shipping — confirm layouts, forms, interactions actually work
- When reviewing PRs that touch frontend code
- Accessibility audits and responsive testing
- 把"前端已经改完"变成"关键页面和核心路径在浏览器里确实可用"
- 适合页面、交互、静态资源发布、关键用户路径和上线前回归确认场景
Trigger Signals / 触发信号
- 需求包含页面、组件、路由、表单、导航、权限跳转或静态资源变更
/team-release需要关键页面 smoke 范围和发布后验证证据- 代码层测试通过了，但仍需确认真实浏览器中的渲染、交互、缓存或网络行为
- QA 或实现角色需要快速确认"关键路径能跑通"而不是一次性补完整 E2E 套件
How It Works
Uses the browser automation MCP (claude-in-chrome, Playwright, or Puppeteer) to interact with live pages like a real user.
Default Approach / 默认做法
- 先锁定 smoke 范围：目标环境、入口 URL、关键页面、核心用户路径、预期可见结果和不在本轮覆盖的内容
- 明确运行方式：优先复用当前环境可用的真实浏览器能力，例如 Playwright CLI、agent-browser 或项目已有 E2E harness；不要为了 ad-hoc smoke 临时搭一整套新测试框架
- 对动态页面，先等页面完成首屏渲染、关键请求返回或交互状态稳定，再判断是否通过；不要在骨架屏、占位态或旧缓存状态下过早下结论
- 优先验证高风险路径：页面可打开、核心导航可达、主操作可完成、关键异常态可触发、静态资源无明显 404/缓存错配
- 用截图、控制台错误、失败步骤和环境说明留下证据，并把结论回交
/team-review、/team-release或角色 handoff
Phase 1: Smoke Test
1. Navigate to target URL
2. Check for console errors (filter noise: analytics, third-party)
3. Verify no 4xx/5xx in network requests
4. Screenshot above-the-fold on desktop + mobile viewport
5. Check Core Web Vitals: LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms
Phase 2: Interaction Test
1. Click every nav link — verify no dead links
2. Submit forms with valid data — verify success state
3. Submit forms with invalid data — verify error state
4. Test auth flow: login → protected page → logout
5. Test critical user journeys (checkout, onboarding, search)
Phase 3: Visual Regression
1. Screenshot key pages at 3 breakpoints (375px, 768px, 1440px)
2. Compare against baseline screenshots (if stored)
3. Flag layout shifts > 5px, missing elements, overflow
4. Check dark mode if applicable
Phase 4: Accessibility
1. Run axe-core or equivalent on each page
2. Flag WCAG AA violations (contrast, labels, focus order)
3. Verify keyboard navigation works end-to-end
4. Check screen reader landmarks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 115 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A b330d0bd3558
browser-qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins (1,364 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,312 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
langbot-testing
Test LangBot WebUI and core product flows with an automated browser and backend logs. Use when validating the configured LangBot frontend, pipeline Debug Chat, model provider setup and test buttons, bot and knowledge-base UI flows, or troubleshooting failed LangBot end-to-end tests.
memstack-development-webapp-testing
Use when the user says 'write browser tests', 'test this page', 'playwright test', 'e2e test', 'end to end test', 'browser test', 'test the UI', or needs Playwright-based browser testing for a web application. Do NOT use for unit tests, API tests, or non-browser testing.
browser-automation
Playwright browser automation via MCP. Covers E2E testing, UI review, web scraping, screenshot capture, and general browser interaction. MCP-first — CLI is fallback only.
playwright
Playwright end-to-end testing best practices for web applications, covering test design, locator strategies, and assertion patterns.
playwright-cursor-rules
Expert guidance for Playwright end-to-end testing with TypeScript and JavaScript best practices.
browser-qa
A live browser quality-checking workflow that replays user journeys with Playwright-compatible scripts, screenshots, and reports. It stores test cases and run evidence under `.agents/qa/`.