Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add curiositech/some_claude_skills --skill code-review-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/curiositech/some_claude_skills/code-review-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/curiositech/some_claude_skills/code-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/curiositech/some_claude_skills/code-review-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/curiositech/some_claude_skills/code-review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/curiositech/some_claude_skills/code-review-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00545 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00272 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review Checklist Generator
Generate thorough, contextual code review checklists that help reviewers focus on what matters most for each specific PR.
When to Use
- Before starting a code review to know what to look for
- When onboarding new team members to review standards
- To ensure consistent review quality across the team
- When reviewing unfamiliar parts of the codebase
Approach
- Analyze the Diff: Understand what files changed and the nature of changes
- Identify Patterns: Detect the type of change (feature, bugfix, refactor, etc.)
- Language-Specific Checks: Apply relevant checks for the programming language
- Project Context: Consider existing patterns and conventions in the codebase
- Generate Checklist: Produce prioritized, actionable review items
Checklist Categories
Security
- Input validation present
- No hardcoded secrets or credentials
- Proper authentication/authorization checks
- SQL injection prevention
- XSS prevention for web code
Performance
- No N+1 query patterns
- Appropriate caching considered
- No unnecessary loops or iterations
- Efficient data structures used
Maintainability
- Code is readable and self-documenting
- Functions are appropriately sized
- No code duplication
- Consistent naming conventions
Testing
- Unit tests cover new functionality
- Edge cases are tested
- Tests are meaningful, not just for coverage
Best Practices
- Prioritize security issues first
- Focus on logic errors over style nitpicks
- Consider the reviewer's time - highlight critical items
- Adapt checklist to project maturity level
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 73 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A d2b69e965dc3
code-review-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository curiositech/some_claude_skills (216 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 545 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…