Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/cwinvestments/memstack/contract-templatenpx skills add cwinvestments/memstack --skill contract-templategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cwinvestments/memstackWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00063 | $0.02326 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01163 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00465 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00233 |
Grade A, and why
memstack-business-contract-template scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 283 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Contract Template — Drafting service agreement...
Provides service agreement, NDA, and subcontractor templates with scope, payment, IP ownership, confidentiality, termination, and liability clauses.
Activation
When this skill activates, output:
Contract Template — Drafting service agreement...
Then execute the protocol below.
Context Guard
| Context | Status |
|---|---|
| User says "contract", "agreement", "service agreement", "NDA" | ACTIVE |
| User says "freelance contract" or "consulting agreement" | ACTIVE |
| User needs a written agreement for client or vendor work | ACTIVE |
| User wants an invoice | DORMANT — use Invoice Generator |
| User wants a project proposal | DORMANT — use Proposal Writer |
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It's Wrong |
|---|---|
| "Handshake deal, no contract" | Verbal agreements are unenforceable. A simple contract protects both parties. |
| "Skip IP ownership clause" | Without explicit IP transfer, the creator often retains rights by default. Always specify. |
| "No termination clause" | Without exit terms, either party is trapped. Define how and when the contract can end. |
| "Copy a template without reading" | Every clause should match your actual arrangement. Mismatched terms create liability. |
| "No dispute resolution" | Without a specified method (mediation, arbitration, jurisdiction), disputes escalate to costly litigation. |
Disclaimer: These templates are starting points, not legal advice. Have an attorney review contracts before use, especially for high-value engagements.
Protocol
Step 1: Gather Contract Requirements
If the user hasn't provided details, ask:
- Contract type — service agreement, NDA, subcontractor agreement, or other?
- Parties — who is the provider and who is the client?
- Scope — what work is being performed?
- Payment — flat fee, hourly, retainer, milestone-based?
- Duration — start date, end date, or ongoing?
- Special terms — non-compete, exclusivity, IP considerations?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 283 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A ab0b447cd0c1
memstack-business-contract-template is a skill published in the GitHub repository cwinvestments/memstack (417 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 2,326 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
plan-ceo-review
CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when…
ship
Ship workflow: detect + merge base branch, run tests, review diff, bump VERSION, update CHANGELOG, commit, push, and create a PR. Use for an explicit /ship invocation or when the user requests the full ship, release, or deploy workflow. For an ordinary commit, push, or pull-request publishing request, use the built-in…
design-review
Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use…
plan-eng-review
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when…
pre-landing-review
Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against the base branch for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues. Use when explicitly asked for the specialized pre-landing workflow. Product /review requests are handled by BitFun's unified Review mechanism instead.…
autoplan
Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when…